Tuesday, August 1, 2023

Marriage is an ancient practice, but there are numerous misconceptions surrounding its nature and purpose. Author and pastor Timothy Keller seeks to clarify what marriage is really about in these key insights from his bestselling book The Meaning of Marriage. 

1. Self-centeredness makes you blind to your own faults and easily offended by your spouse’s.

"Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ." — Ephesians 5:21

For both husband and wife, the most important (and most challenging) object of marriage is to live for the other rather than oneself. Opportunities for a husband and wife to serve each other come up constantly throughout the day. We can either joyfully serve the other, begrudgingly serve the other, or insist on getting our own way. The first option is by far the hardest to put into practice, but it is the only way both parties will enjoy happiness and fulfillment in marriage.

In a letter to the Corinthians, Paul demonstrates that love is the opposite of "self-seeking" or self-serving. We respond to self-centeredness in kind because self-centeredness in its essence prevents you from seeing its work within you and keeps you appalled by and sensitive to the self-centeredness of others. It has a corrosive effect on the marriage, eating away at what is good until there’s nothing left but despair and bitterness.

If the goal is to serve the other—rather than to be happy—you will both end up being happiest. Both sides must have the same selfless goal.

Most problems in marriage are rooted in one or the other being selfish, seeking to have their needs met over and above the needs of the other. And we always consider the other partner's selfishness as more problematic than our own. But when we do that, we put the emphasis on their need to change. When both sides do this, resentment builds, and distance is created. Both sides will feel hurt and frustration at things the other partner does or doesn't do for them, but they'll resign themselves to just live with this new reality, and the marriage might survive, but it will never thrive. They will be "settling" for a marriage that doesn't fully satisfy.

The answer is to treat our own self-centeredness—not our spouse's—as the primary problem. No excuses or justifications. Take ownership of your own behavior. When both sides do this, marriage thrives and a deeper happiness and satisfaction are enjoyed on both sides. Think of yourself less, and of your spouse more, and the rest will fall into place. Your partner's joy should not be robbed by the crushing obligation to always meet your needs. Rather, they should be liberated to joyfully and willingly meet your needs just because you're their spouse, and you've self-sacrificially taken the initiative to meet theirs. This is biblical love in marriage.

2. Giving pleasure and happiness to your spouse—even when you aren’t in the mood—tends to increase your own satisfaction.

Biblical love is sacrificial commitment to the good of another. You can measure your love for someone by how much you’re willing to give up for them. How much are you willing to invest in them?

Love is not just an emotional feeling, but action and duty. You can’t expect to both be in the mood for sex all the time. That’s unrealistic. But a willingness to please the other when he or she is in the mood can produce the right mood in you on the spot. When it is a privilege to pleasure your spouse and bring him or her joy—rather than a mechanical, heartless obligation—the act can change your mood.

C.S. Lewis said that if you act like you love someone, you will begin to actually love him. The same principle can work in the bedroom. Act like you desire your spouse—behave as if you were in the mood—and the mood will come. What starts as a performance turns into genuine pleasure.

The good of the relationship takes precedence over the immediate needs of the individual. This is because marriage is a covenant not just with each other, but with God. Your duty and commitment to your spouse is akin to that of your duty to your children. You do not cut ties when parenting becomes difficult—the commitment is not contingent on how you feel. It isn’t merely emotional. Same with marriage. It’s much deeper than that. Sometimes you aren’t loved the way you want to be, but if you return the neglect with neglect of your own, the marriage will spiral into decay and die. Two-thirds of unhappy marriages become happy again within five years if they stay together instead of divorcing. The duty of marriage is to keep acting in love, even in the moments when you don’t feel like it. Doing so may be hard, but it will revive your marriage like nothing else can.

3. You will be a better parent if you prioritize your marriage over your relationship with your children.

While it's important to understand what marriage is, it's equally important to understand what marriage is for. Marriage is the most profound relationship possible. It is the union of two people as best friends and lovers. Rather than being alone, a married person has a built-in partner for life, someone who will be there every step of the way, supporting and loving you as you are molded and shaped into the person God wants you to become. The importance of friendship and companionship in marriage cannot be overstated. If sexual attraction or financial standing are what bind you together, your relationship will always be vulnerable; it is on a weak foundation. Friendship must underlie everything else as the bedrock for the relationship.

The marriage relationship is the most important relationship, even more so than the parent-child relationship. God did not put a parent and a child in the garden of Eden—rather, he put a husband and a wife together. As the most important relationship you'll ever have, it must get more investment and energy from you than anything else. Nothing in your life is more important or deserving of your attention and care. Of course, if your marriage is your focus, you'll be an even better parent as a result. Focus on your spouse, and the relationship with your children will thrive. Focus on the children to the neglect of your spouse, and your family will crumble.

When a man complains that he feels secondary to the kids, the schedule, the dishes, the chores, the busyness of life, the marriage is in danger. His wife has failed to prioritize him. When a woman complains that she feels secondary to the kids, the career, the clients, and so on, the marriage is in danger. Her husband has failed to prioritize her. Counseling is often needed in these scenarios to get the couple focused on what's most important: each other.

4. Neither marriage nor your spouse created flaws in you—they merely exposed what was already there.

We are all flawed and imperfect. While you may be somewhat blind to each other's flaws when you first meet and fall in love, you cannot stay blind to them once married. Think of a bridge that has some cracks and fissures in it, then imagine a heavy truck driving across it. The truck's weight causes the cracks to widen and deepen. It does not cause the cracks in the first place; rather, it exposes them and makes them more obvious. In the same way, marriage applies pressure on individuals in ways that cause their pre-existing flaws and weaknesses to be exposed. We may blame our spouse for making us behave a certain way, but the spouse is no more to blame than the truck.

In truth, the fact that our spouses expose our character flaws is one of the benefits of marriage. It allows us to identify the areas where we need to do the most work on ourselves. Thus we can see that marriage has the power of truth; it has the power to make us confront our shortcomings and character flaws, and grow into better people as we deal with them. The healthiest marriages are the ones where both spouses welcome the truth from each other. They welcome their own exposure and the gentle criticisms of their lovers so they can grow into better life partners over time. One of the ways of loving your spouse is to speak truth to them)—not to tear them down, but to help them grow.

Don't blame your spouse for your unhappiness. Don't withdraw when you encounter their flaws. Don't downgrade your expectations. Don't settle for just "getting along." Don't, upon becoming frustrated with your partner's shortcomings, seek another partner who doesn't have the same flaws. Rather, speak the truth to each other in love, and be willing to act on what you hear. If you already have the desire to work on your problems, rather than run away from them, then you're well on your way to a healthy, happy marriage.

Love comes in different currencies. Give love in the currency that your spouse values. If your spouse values acts of service, giving her flowers will be nice, but it won't be as powerful and effective as helping with the household chores. If you're out of sync with each other—that is, speaking different love languages or using different currencies—you'll find yourself feeling depleted. You'll be giving of yourself in ways that aren't appreciated, and your own emotional and physical needs won't be satisfied. It is also important to recognize and appreciate the love being offered, even if it isn't coming through in your preferred language. Your spouse is trying, in such cases, even if they aren't perfectly in tune with you.

Never abuse the primary love language of your spouse. Never withhold it to hurt them, or hold it over their head as a manipulative tool. For example, a man who deeply values respect will be wounded to the core if his wife mocks him publicly with intent to hurt him.

Telling the truth to your spouse is important, but equally important is the need to forgive and exercise grace when your spouse sins or fails you in some way. Just as Christ forgave us, we must be willing to forgive each other without holding onto resentment.

5. Submission in Christian marriage is a two-way street.

Terms like “headship” and “submission” are controversial until you understand them in their proper context, with Christ as the model. If God himself could become a servant for others without damaging his dignity, so can we. A wife’s submission to her husband is not degrading or demeaning; it is God’s design. There is nothing greater than aligning one’s life and purpose with God’s original intent and design for you. Christ showed greatness, not weakness, when he came to submit and serve. The same can be said of the submissive wife.

Men are not exempt from the challenge of submission. They are called to be servant-leaders—to love their wives self-sacrificially, as Christ loved the church. The world's understanding of leadership looks down on those who are submissive, but Christ provides the proper model for what true leadership is meant to look like. In biblical marriage, wives submit to their husbands, and husbands love their wives self-sacrificially, even to the point of death. While the roles differ, neither is greater than the other, and neither spouse should put their own interests first. Conformity to God's design confounds the world, but it is the way things were meant to be, and it is the best thing for us.

What if you aren't on the same page? Ultimately, you can only control your own behavior. You can't make your spouse love and serve you the way you love and serve them. You can only do your part, and nothing is more likely than that to motivate your spouse to reciprocate.

6. Despite common caricatures of Christian prudishness, Scripture has a high view of sex and sexuality.

While many think the Bible has a low view of sex—treating it as dirty or degrading—nothing could be further from the truth. The Bible refutes that misconception at every turn, offering a positive view of sex and sexuality. It also limits sexual activity to the confines of marriage between one man and one woman.

Marriage is the union of a man and woman in every way—legally, financially, socially, emotionally, and physically. Sex deepens and maintains that union. It is the most powerful way to give yourself to another, to communicate to them that you are theirs. It isn't just about personal satisfaction or gratification; it's about self-giving, and reinforcing the marriage covenant. It unites two people "as one flesh," and that is why it must be confined to marriage. If you use a prostitute for your own pleasure, you're divorcing sex from its purpose as a uniting feature of marriage commitment. Like chewing food without swallowing, sex outside marriage robs you of the actual benefits (and purpose) of the act.

Married couples are instructed to enjoy sex on a regular basis. Paul reminds married couples that their bodies are not their own; in the marriage union, the husband's body belongs to his wife, and vice versa. Each spouse has an obligation—one that should be joyfully met—to sexually satisfy the other according to their needs. Denying each other is prohibited, except by mutual consent.

Your primary purpose in sex should not be your own gratification, but that of your spouse. Nothing should bring you greater pleasure than pleasuring your spouse. Commit yourself to being aroused by producing arousal in your spouse and your sex life will flourish. This is an important principle, especially for the spouse with a lower sex drive. If your purpose in sex is to give pleasure, rather than receive it, you'll give it joyfully as a gift to your spouse who wants and needs it more than you. With the right heart and mentality in place, their satisfaction will bring you satisfaction.

If you think of your marriage as an engine, sex is the oil that keeps it running smoothly. A healthy, joyful sex life keeps the engine lubricated, reducing friction. Never stop working on improving your sex life.

Sex is glorious. God meant for it to be rapturous for us, but he also intended it as a foreshadowing of the glorious union we'll one day share with Christ.

Tuesday, June 27, 2023

Lies About Christian Men and Marriages: What the Data Really Say!

The problem accusations against Christian men and marriages is that accusers ignore the data from the social sciences. Sociologists have examined these accusations and asked, ‘What was the evidence?’ So they went back and did the studies.

And now it’s very clear that husbands and fathers who attend church regularly are the most loving husbands and engaged fathers. Unlike the average American family, evangelical men are the most loving to their wives. These wives report feeling the most loved and appreciated by their husbands. They’re the most engaged with their children in terms of shared activities like sports and church youth group and discipline like setting screen time and bedtime. They have the lowest level of divorce of any group in America. They have the lowest rates of domestic violence of any major group in America. Even Christians don’t know this.

Brad Wilcox wrote an article in The New York Times, saying that the happiest of all wives in America are religious conservatives. 73% of wives who hold conservative gender values and attend religious services regularly with their husbands have high-quality marriages. Then he says, ‘You academics need to cast aside your prejudices against evangelicals, and religious conservatives in general and realize that evangelical, protestant men have the best marriages, are the most loving husbands and the most engaged fathers.’

The reason that the statistics show something else is that we hear that Christians divorce at the same rate as others. Those researchers returned to the data and separated truly committed authentic Christian men who regularly attended from nominal Christian men. These men might check the Baptist box, but whose Christianity is mostly cultural, they don’t attend church regularly. The differences between these two groups are shocking. Nominal Christian men have the worst marriages and report the lowest level of happiness. They’re the least engaged with their children and have the highest divorce rate and domestic violence, even above secular men.  

And this is why the statistics become skewed. You get a misleading statistic if you take truly committed Christian men and put them alongside nominal Christian men who are worse than secular men. That’s another reason most of us don’t realize that truly committed Christian men are doing far better than any other group in America. 
 
- Nancy Pearcey


"Pride Month" - Normalizing Sin

Pride Month was and still is obviously upon us. From the ubiquitous rainbow flags and public  drag celebrations to the quasi-aborted attempts by retailers such as Target to normalize what, just five seconds ago, every average American would have said was absurd, the message is clear: “Join us in celebrating every sexual deviancy known to man, or we will cancel you, shun you, shame you, and punish you, for your intolerable intolerance.”

In the face of such societal deconstruction, how are we to respond? More specifically, how should traditional Christians react in a market square of ideas that is so laden with antipathy for the traditions and teachings of the Gospel that just yesterday were assumed to be the cultural glue that held our country together? 

The following is intended to be an intramural discussion. This message is for those who claim to hold to a biblical worldview and the redemptive truth of the Gospel. If you’re not a follower of Christ, you can listen in if you want, but please recognize the context: This is for the church and those who say they believe in Jesus. 

So here it is.  

Dear Church:

What is wrong with you? How did you become so blind? Why did you stoop so low? Who removed your mind, and when did you darken your soul? 

If I’ve said it once, I’ve said it a hundred times: When you buy the lie that your identity is nothing more than the sum total of your inclinations, there is no limit to the lengths you will go to normalize your sin. 

Surely you can see that this is the exact opposite of biblical holiness, can’t you? 

Do you no longer believe in 2 Corinthians 5:17? Are you not a new creation in Christ? Hasn’t the old passed away? Haven’t all things become new? Have you given up the blessed hope of transformation? Have you actually come to the point where you think you’re defined by your desires? Have you forgotten that Jesus himself explicitly said, “You must be born again,” and that he never affirmed anyone simply because they were “born that way”?

Your message of “love is love” is not love. It is enablement, and it is cruel. It is the opposite of sanctification. It is sinful, and it is wrong. 

Your “affirming” mantra is not only bad theology, but it is terrible ontology and anthropology. When you accept the definition of the person as being “gay, trans, bi, queer,” or even cis, for that matter, you are admitting that you think those who have a given sexual appetite are defined by that desire. You are essentially saying that you think, “That’s just who they are.” You implicitly place no value on repentance, revival, renewal, confession and self-control.   

This is the ultimate insult to God and God’s creation. We are the imago Dei; we are made in the image of God. We are not defined by our bellies or our libidos. We are not animals. We are not the imago dog. 

We (the body of Christ) should never cede any ground in Satan’s game to redefine God and redefine His people. The entire nomenclature of LGBTQ and Pride, by definition, consigns people to their own unique “communities,” i.e., gulags. This balkanization is not the way of Christ or the way of the church. We are better than this. We are more than this. We should love people enough not to label them in such a demeaning way. 

To our shame, even nonbelievers such as Gore Vidal and Michel Foucault understood this. Foucault once said, “We are creating a hermaphrodism — a false species.”

Vidal later added: “There is no more such a thing as a homosexual person than there is a heterosexual person. These are behavioral adjectives.”

A final word: It never ceases to amaze me how those of you who wave your rainbow banners of “love trumps hate” in your respective churches become so vitriolic when presented with a cogent argument that challenges the vacuity of your moral paradigm: Head pastors and parachurch leaders posting ad hominem attacks dripping with mockery and sarcasm. Youth pastors call anyone who is 10 years their senior “judgmental and old.” And all under the banner of “acceptance,” “respect” and “inclusion.”

Do you not see the irony? Are you blind to the fact that you are sawing off the very branch upon which you sit? The words of Jesus come to mind here: “Physician, heal thyself.” Or perhaps those of Isaiah: “Woe unto him who calls good evil and evil good.” And dare I add, woe unto him who calls love hate and hate love? 

Yours is not the good news of the Gospel. It is not the message of Christ. It is sin, and if Jesus were still in his grave, he’d be rolling over. But as it is, he sits upon his throne, preparing to utter some of the most frightening words known to man: “Depart from me; I never knew you.” 

by Everett Piper (dreverettpiper.com, @dreverettpiper), a columnist for The Washington Times, is a former university president and radio host.

Saturday, June 24, 2023

The Toxic War on Masculinity by Nancy Pearcey

 WHY DOES NANCY PEARCEY FOCUS ON THE ATTACK ON MASCULINITY?

Hostility against men has become so acceptable in mainstream publications that the Washington Post had an article called ‘Why can’t we hate men?’ And the Huffington Post had an article saying, ‘My favorite hashtag is kill all men.’ You can buy t-shirts that say, ‘So many men, so little ammunition.’ And then books come out with titles like ‘I hate men.’ ‘No good men.’ ‘Are men necessary?’ And I thought, wait a minute, where did this come from? A couple of months ago, the director of the movie Avatar said, ‘Testosterone is a toxin.’

Another male author writes that talking about healthy masculinity is like talking about healthy cancer.

The trigger that made me say, ‘We have to address this,’ was the incredible hostility against men. There was a survey done in 2016 in which 46% of American men said, ‘Society seems to punish men these days just for being men.’ These days, this discrimination against men has become worse than the discrimination against women. You can’t address something effectively if you don’t look at where it came from and how it developed. So that was one of the major goals of the book.

WHERE DID HOSTILITY AGAINST MEN START?

One of the surprising things that I found in writing this book is that if we want to deal with it effectively, we have to go much further back. Families worked together in the colonial age before the industrial revolution. The father worked with his children all day on the family business. 

Early America was primarily Christian, so a Biblical view of masculinity existed. The dominant social expectation of the time focused more on men’s caretaking role. Their authority in the family meant they were responsible for the common good. That authority didn’t mean you could do whatever you wanted. Rather, it meant you had responsibility for the common good of the marriage, family, and church. All of this changed when the Industrial Revolution began. That’s when the rhetoric changed. As men no longer worked alongside people they loved, they were now competing with other men. 

I quote a letter to the editor in a newspaper from the nineteenth century saying, ‘In the pursuit of economic success, American men are losing their souls.’ Elizabeth Katie Stanton, one of the first feminists, gave a speech titled ‘The Destructive Male.’ In it, she said, ‘The male element is a destructive force; stern, selfish, aggrandizing, loving war, violence, conquest, acquisition, and breeding discord, disorder, disease, and death. What America needs is a new evangel of womanhood. To exalt beauty, virtue, morality, true religion, to lift man to the higher realms of thought and action.’ She preached a gospel of feminism. This double standard meant that women were expected to hold men in line. But on the other hand, men were expected to be immoral or lack integrity. My book goes back there and traces the history so that we can understand it better.

NANCY PEARCEY EXPLAINS THE HEALTHIEST FAMILIES

‘Conservative protestant gender ideology can lead to abuse both physical and emotional. It is no secret that abuse is prevalent in conservative churches that embrace headship theory.’ The problem with these accusations is that they ignored the data from the social sciences. Sociologists have examined these accusations and asked, ‘What was the evidence?’ So they went back and did the studies. 

And now it’s very clear that husbands and fathers who attend church regularly are the most loving husbands and engaged fathers. Unlike the average American family, evangelical men are the most loving to their wives. These wives report feeling the most loved and appreciated by their husbands. They’re the most engaged with their children in terms of shared activities like sports and church youth group and discipline like setting screen time and bedtime. They have the lowest level of divorce of any group in America. They have the lowest rates of domestic violence of any major group in America. Even Christians don’t know this.

THE HAPPIEST MARRIAGES

Brad Wilcox wrote an article in The New York Times, saying that the happiest of all wives in America are religious conservatives. 73% of wives who hold conservative gender values and attend religious services regularly with their husbands have high-quality marriages. Then he says, ‘You academics need to cast aside your prejudices against evangelicals, and religious conservatives in general and realize that evangelical, protestant men have the best marriages, are the most loving husbands and the most engaged fathers.’

The reason that the statistics show something else is that we hear that Christians divorce at the same rate as others. Those researchers returned to the data and separated truly committed authentic Christian men who regularly attended from nominal Christian men. These men might check the Baptist box, but whose Christianity is mostly cultural, they don’t attend church regularly. The differences between these two groups are shocking. Nominal Christian men have the worst marriages and report the lowest level of happiness. They’re the least engaged with their children and have the highest divorce rate and domestic violence, even above secular men.  

And this is why the statistics become skewed. You get a misleading statistic if you take truly committed Christian men and put them alongside nominal Christian men who are worse than secular men. That’s another reason most of us don’t realize that truly committed Christian men are doing far better than any other group in America. 

EVANGELICAL PROTESTANTISM HELPS WOMEN

In my book, I focus mostly on America because otherwise, it would be too big. But I have a few examples from other countries. In Colombia, there was an anthropologist/Marxist. She expected that Protestantism would lead to patriarchal males dominating their families. She shockingly discovered the opposite. What she found is that when a man converts and becomes an evangelical protestant, he stops drinking, he stops gambling, and he stops visiting prostitutes. His money goes to his family. His family experiences a rise in the standard of living. This anthropologist concludes that if there is a women’s movement that helps women, it’s evangelical Protestantism. 

Then there was a large study done by an anthropologist at the University of London. She included not only Latin America but Africa and Asia. She found the evangelical gender paradox creates a partnership between women and the church where they hold men accountable for the typical male vices, like drinking and adultery and visiting prostitutes, and so on. In her words, ‘The church helps men put the needs of the household above their own pleasure.’ She also says if there’s a women’s movement, it’s not the Western AIDS organizations or Western feminism. The so-called backward, unsophisticated evangelicalism has done more for women than anything else. 

And the last one was a bestselling book, Half the Sky, by Nicholas Kristof. He went around the world to look at the status of women in other countries and concluded that Christians were helping women more than anyone else. He said, ‘The evangelical church applies community pressure to bring wayward husbands back in line. It discourages alcoholism and adultery practices that have caused tremendous hardship to women, especially in places like Africa.’ 

THE UNITING IDEA OF GOOD MEN

There was a sociologist, he’s not a Christian, but he’s very well known in his field, so he gets invited to speak worldwide. When he does, he asks young men two questions. First, he says, ‘What does it mean to be a good man? You’re at a funeral, and in the eulogy, somebody says he was a good man.’ People had no problem answering that. They said things like honor, integrity, sacrifice, looking out for the little guy, providing, protecting, and being generous. 

And he would ask where they learned that. They would say, ‘It’s just in the air we breathe.’ In the West, they would say, ‘It’s a Judeo-Christian heritage.’ Then he would follow up with, ‘What if I say to you, man up; Be a real man.’ And the young men would say that’s completely different. That means be tough and strong, never show weakness, win at all costs, be competitive, get rich, and get laid. 

That’s the competing grips to masculinity in the culture today. God made man in His image, and they know what it means to be a good man. The first ever cross-cultural study done on the concepts of masculinity by an anthropologist found that no matter how different they were in understanding what it means to be a man, all cultures expect men to perform what he calls the three p’s: provide, protect, and procreate. This means contributing to society for the next generation. 

MEN AND WOMEN ARE DIFFERENT

Biologically men are bigger, stronger, faster, and have more fast twitch muscles (which means they can react more quickly). They have 75% greater muscle mass and 90% greater strength. It’s natural that all cultures expect men to be the providers, protectors, and procreators. Can you imagine if a woman was pregnant and nursing and went off to war? Of course, she’s not going to go off to war. We also have to ensure we’re always talking about women regarding their strengths.

It’s important to say, ‘Women’s superpower is having babies.’ It takes incredible strength of character to raise an infant. You have to be on call 24 hours/day. You have to be willing to drop whatever you’re doing at 3 in the morning when the baby wakes up hungry. Whenever the baby’s in distress, you don’t scold them, and you don’t reason with them; you meet their needs, no matter what you want to be doing. It takes incredible character strength and sensitivity to nonverbal cues and threats in their environment. 

WHAT NANCY PEARCEY SEES AS THE LONG TERM SOLUTION

The most important long-term solution to toxic behavior in men is close, loving bonds between fathers and sons. And right now, 40% of American children grow up without contact with their natural father. A psychiatrist, who I quote in the book, says, ‘We’re not going to get a better group of men until we get a better group of fathers who are willing to stick it out and be there for their sons.’ So the long-term solution is we need to look at these fatherless kids. Everyone knows that single-parent families are not as effective. They have children, especially boys, who are more likely to drop out of school, be addicted to drugs and alcohol, get pregnant outside of marriage, and end up behind bars. 90% of violent offenders are from fatherless homes. 

We need to focus on getting fathers more involved with their children. I would suggest that churches should have a ministry for fatherless boys. Father substitutes like a youth pastor, a youth group leader, a coach, and a teacher can have an incredible impact on a young boy. I think churches should rethink and reprioritize some of their ministries and make this one higher on their list. How do we reach out to fatherless boys?

NANCY PEARCEY PROVIDES HOPE FOR HEALTHY MASCULINITY

In my book, The Toxic War on Masculinity, I look at the changing views of fathers because today, the media mocks fathers. No wonder fatherhood has lost status, and fewer men want to become fathers. That, too, started with the Industrial Revolution. Fathers were no longer in the home, teaching their children daily what it meant to be a man and what it meant to acquire adult skills. Now men were in the workplace, and the kids didn’t see them all day. In the nineteenth century, people protested that fathers were no longer involved with the kids. 

The leading Psychologist of the nineteenth century said, ‘Never before in American history have boys been so wild because fathers were not there to discipline them. Never before have they been so half orphaned and left up to female guidance in family, school, and church.’ In their day, they were acutely aware of what they’d lost by fathers being out of the home all day. People began to say that fathers were irrelevant and incompetent because they were no longer in touch with what was happening in the home. 

I have a chapter on practical ways that men can tweak the workplace. We can’t undo the Industrial Revolution, but can we tweak it so that fathers have more time at home? The slight silver lining in the pandemic was that 66% of fathers liked being home more. A recent headline in the New York Times said, ‘During the pandemic, fathers got closer to their children, and they don’t want to lose that.’ On surveys, men report just as much work-family conflict as women do. I think the solution for both is to bring more work home. 

ABOUT NANCY PEARCEY

Nancy Pearcey is the author of the upcoming book The Toxic War on Masculinity: How Christianity Reconciles the Sexes. Her most recently published book is Love Thy Body: Answering Hard Questions about Life and Sexuality. Her earlier books include The Soul of Science, Saving Leonardo, Finding Truth,and two ECPA Gold Medallion Award Winners: How Now Shall We Live(coauthored with Harold Fickett and Chuck Colson) and Total Truth. 

Her books have been translated into 19 languages. She is professor and scholar in residence at Houston Christian University. A former agnostic, Pearcey has spoken at universities such as Princeton, Stanford, USC, and Dartmouth. She has been quoted in The New Yorker and Newsweek, highlighted as one of the five top women apologists by Christianity Today, and hailed in The Economist as “America’s preeminent evangelical Protestant female intellectual.”

Friday, June 23, 2023

What Does God Say About Pride?

“There is one vice, a sin of which no man in the world is free. [That] essential vice, that utmost evil, is pride. Pride leads to every other vice...It is the complete anti-God state of mind” - C.S. Lewis, 1942 Pride is the complete anti-God state of mind. It is the sin that leads to all others.” - C.S. Lewis                                                                  

Here’s just a sampling of what God says about pride:

“Pride and arrogance and … I hate” (Proverbs 8:13).

“God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble” (James 4:6).

“Everyone who is arrogant in heart is an abomination to the Lord; be assured, he will not go unpunished” (Proverbs 16:5).

“Haughty eyes and a proud heart, the lamp of the wicked, are sin” (Proverbs 21:4).

“Humble yourselves before the Lord, and He will exalt you” (James 4:10).

“For though the Lord is high, he regards the lowly, but the haughty he knows from afar” (Psalm 138:6).

“Love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant” (1 Corinthians 13:4).

“The Lord tears down the house of the proud” (Proverbs 15:25).

“The Lord preserves the faithful but abundantly repays the one who acts in pride” (Psalm 31:23).

“[T]his is the one to whom I will look: he who is humble and contrite in spirit and trembles at my word” (Isaiah 66:2).

“He sees everything that is high; he is king over all the sons of pride” (Job 41:34).

“If anyone imagines that he knows something, he does not yet know as he ought to know” (1 Corinthians 8:2).

“For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted” (Luke 14:11).

“Thus says the Lord: ‘Let not the wise man boast in his wisdom’” (Jeremiah 9:23).

“Therefore, let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall” (1 Corinthians 10:12).

“Pride goes before destruction and a haughty spirit before a fall” (Proverbs 16:18).

“Whoever has a haughty look and an arrogant heart, I will not endure” (Psalm 101:5).

“One’s pride will bring him low, but he who is lowly in spirit will obtain honor” (Proverbs 29:23).

“Do you see a man who is wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him” (Proverbs 26:12).

“The haughty looks of man shall be brought low, and the lofty pride of men shall be humbled, and the Lord alone will be exalted in that day” (Isaiah 2:11).

“The Lord of hosts has purposed it, to defile the pompous pride of all glory, to dishonor all the honored of the earth” (Isaiah 23:9).

“For the Lord of hosts has a day against all that is proud and lofty, against all that is lifted up — and it shall be brought low” (Isaiah 2:12).

“I will punish the world for its evil and the wicked for their iniquity; I will put an end to the pomp of the arrogant and lay low the pompous pride of the ruthless” (Isaiah 13:11).

“For the wicked boasts of the desires of his soul, and the one greedy for gain curses and renounces the Lord. In the pride of his face, the wicked does not seek him; all his thoughts are, ‘There is no God’” (Psalm 10:3-4).

“It is better to be of a lowly spirit with the poor than to divide the spoil with the proud” (Proverbs 16:19).

“Do not be haughty… Never be wise in your own sight” (Romans 12:16).

“For if anyone thinks he is something when he is nothing, he deceives himself” (Galatians 6:3).

“Whoever has a haughty look and an arrogant heart, I will not endure” (Psalm 101:5).

“Clothe yourselves, all of you, with humility toward one another, for “God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble” (1 Peter 5:5).

“If my people, who are called by my name, shall humble themselves, pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and will heal their land” (2 Chronicles 7:14).

“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth. Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God” (Matthew 5).

Everett Piper (dreverettpiper.com, @dreverettpiper), a columnist for The Washington Times, is a former university president and radio host.

Wednesday, June 21, 2023

How the Bible Presents Itself vs. How Many Try to Present It

The chart below captures how many people present the Bible’s progression from Genesis to Revelation versus how the Bible presents its own redemptive progression. 

The first chart depicts how the Bible is typically presented, which is thoroughly focused on the individual. Is it any wonder, then, that so many in our churches (and in Christian para-church ministries) are focused on themselves and think the Bible is a kind of self-help resource? 

The second chart accurately represents the biblical focus on Christ as the promised one who brings all things to fulfillment. 

The entire Bible is about Jesus. Jesus is the Gospel. Therefore, the Bible - Old and New Testaments - is about the Gospel. It is God's Story - sort of His autobiography - and He writes into it those who repent and believe in Christ alone.

Tuesday, May 23, 2023

Olympic Hero Jesse Owens' Remarkable Friendship

Jesse Owens won the gold medal for the long jump in the 1936 summer Olympics in Germany.⁣⁣ In the photo, the man saluting behind Owens is Lutz Long, a German who shared training tips with Owens and was the first to openly congratulate him after his final jump in full view of Adolf Hitler.

After the Olympics, the two kept in touch via mail. Below is Long's last letter to Owens while he was stationed with the German Army in North Africa during World War 2. Long was later killed in action during the allied invasion of Sicily in 1943.⁣⁣ ⁣⁣

"I am here, Jesse, where it seems there is only the dry sand and the wet blood. I do not fear so much for myself, my friend Jesse, I fear for my woman who is home, and my young son Karl, who has never really known his father.⁣⁣ My heart tells me, if I be honest with you, that this is the last letter I shall ever write. If it is so, I ask you something. It is a something so very important to me. It is you go to Germany when this war done, someday find my Karl, and tell him about his father. Tell him, Jesse, what times were like when we not separated by war. I am saying—tell him how things can be between men on this earth.⁣⁣ ⁣⁣ If you do this something for me, this thing that I need the most to know will be done, I do something for you, now. I tell you something I know you want to hear. And it is true.⁣⁣ ⁣⁣ That hour in Berlin when I first spoke to you, when you had your knee upon the ground, I knew that you were in prayer.⁣⁣ ⁣⁣ Then I not know how I know. Now I do. I know it is never by chance that we come together. I come to you that hour in 1936 for purpose more than der Berliner Olympiade.⁣⁣ ⁣⁣ And you, I believe, will read this letter, while it should not be possible to reach you ever, for purpose more even than our friendship.⁣⁣ ⁣⁣ I believe this shall come about because I think now that God will make it come about. This is what I have to tell you, Jesse.⁣⁣ ⁣⁣ I think I might believe in God.⁣⁣ And I pray to him that, even while it should not be possible for this to reach you ever, these words I write will still be read by you.⁣⁣ ⁣⁣ Your brother,⁣⁣ Luz"⁣⁣

Jesse found Lutz' son Karl in 1951. They became friends and Jesse was his best man when Karl got married!