Lewis Grizzard, the
famous Atlanta newspaper columnist, wrote frequently of his ill-fated
marriages, divorces, and remarriages. Eventually, he said he was going to give
up on marriage altogether, that there wouldn’t be another Mrs. Grizzard. “I’m
just going to find a woman who hates me and buy her a house,” he quipped.
Grizzard’s lament elicited laughter, despite the obvious tragedy of his
relational life, because it rang true to an American culture increasingly rife
with gender wars. The universal tensions between men and women sometimes show
up in their most innocuous form in jokes from women about men who fail to clean
up after themselves around the house, or from men about women who can’t
remember to keep their cell phones turned on. But the gender tensions run into
much darker territory.
The divorce culture
around us is the most obvious sign of men and women in conflict with one
another, as marriages are ripped asunder and the custody of children fought
over in law courts in virtually every major city on the planet. Even beyond
that, many reverberations of the sexual revolution are built on self-protecting
mechanisms for men and women who, at best, don’t trust one another and, at
worst, want to exploit one another. Divorce courts and abortion clinics, porn
sites and chick flicks— these all reveal men and women who, far from merging
into some sort of unisex utopia, find it impossible to give themselves fully to
the other.
That’s what the
biblical concept of manhood and womanhood is about. The biblical notion of
certain creational distinctives of what it means to be a man or a woman isn’t
really about “who’s in charge,” and it certainly isn’t about “who’s the best.”
King Jesus dismisses such categories— though common in our commercial,
corporate, and athletic spheres—in favor of a newer sense of servant-dominion
in His kingdom.
The chief analogy
used for the male/ female relationship—specifically in terms of the marital
one-flesh union—is that of head and body. This is because, the Bible maintains,
we are not genderless persons who happen to have been placed in arbitrary male
and female bodies. Sexual differentiation isn’t simply a matter of genital
architecture. From the very beginning, Scripture teaches, humanity is created
“male and female” (Gen. 1:27; Mark 10:6).
Sometimes Christians
will argue that male/female distinctions are obliterated by the new covenant.
Doesn’t the Apostle Paul tell us that there is neither “male nor female” in
Christ (Gal. 3:28)? Certainly, in terms of inheritance,
there is no distinction. Men and women alike— not just firstborn sons—share in
Jesus’ identity and, thus, in His inheritance of the universe. But Scripture
doesn’t teach that this differentiation is in every way gone—in fact, the Bible
directly applies some aspects of God’s commands to men and some to women.
Masculinity and femininity are not aspects of the fallen order to be overcome;
they are instead part of what God declared from the beginning to be “very good”
(Gen. 1:31).
In fact, the mystery
of the gospel explains to us why it is that Adam wasn’t designed to subdivide
like an amoeba, why he needed someone like him and yet different from him, why
he was to join himself to her in an organic union. It’s because the head/body
union of a man and a woman is itself an illustration— one that points to
something older and more beautiful: the union of Christ and His church in
the gospel.
A man, then, is to
lead his family. But this is not some sort of tyranny. A man’s leadership is
modeled after Christ’s leadership of His church. He leads by discerning the
best interests of his family and pouring himself out for them. This headship is
self-sacrificial. A wife submits to her husband’s leadership not as a cowering
supplicant but in the way the church submits to Christ. Jesus says of His
church, in its original twelve foundation stones, “No longer do I call you
servants, for the servant does not know what his master is doing; but I have
called you friends, for all that I have heard from my Father I have made known
to you” (John 15:15).
When we call husbands
to lead their families, and when we call wives to respect such leadership
(which, like every form of leadership, has biblical limits), we are not
speaking of a business model or a corporate flow chart. We’re speaking instead
of an organic unity. The more a husband and wife are sanctified together in the
Word, the more they—like your nervous system and body—move and operate
smoothly, effortlessly, holistically. They are oneflesh. It’s about cooperation
through complementarity.
When Jesus carried
out His gospel mission, the satanic powers sought to tempt the church to carry
out the mission given to Christ (Matt. 16:22–23; 26:51–52), and sought to tempt Christ to seek His
own provision rather than that for His bride (4:2–4). Jesus, though, set His
face like flint toward the Place of the Skull, and the church eventually, by
God’s grace, yielded to being served by the washing of water (Eph. 5:26).
The church
continually works to reclaim a biblical concept of the family. We call men to
prepare themselves to be other-directed husbands. We call on women to find
their beauty not in cultural stereotypes of a woman’s value but in God’s
delight (1 Peter 3:1–6). Such will
look increasingly and, oddly, peaceful to a culture conditioned to gender wars.
But in the end, it’s not about being better men and women. It’s about a clear
proclamation of the mystery of Christ and His church. They’re not in tension
with one another, in competition with one another, mistrusting one another.
They’re head and body—one flesh.
Dr. Moore earned a B.S. in history and political science from the University of Southern Mississippi. He also received the M.Div. in biblical studies from New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, and the Ph.D. in systematic theology from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.
A widely-sought cultural commentator, Dr. Moore speaks frequently to issues of theology, culture, and public policy, having been quoted or published by many of the nation’s leading news agencies and periodicals—including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, USA Today, and the Associated Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment