Thursday, August 1, 2024

Just How Sovereign is God?

“I believe that every particle of dust that dances in the sunbeam does not move an atom more or less than God wishes - that every particle of spray that dashes against the steamboat has its orbit, as well as the sun in the heavens - that the chaff from the hand of the winnower is steered as the stars in their courses.

“The creeping of an aphid over the rosebud is as much fixed as the march of the devastating pestilence - the fall of sere leaves from a poplar is as fully ordained as the tumbling of an avalanche.”

- Charles Spurgeon

Here is a tiny bit more of what Scripture teaches on God’s sovereignty:

God Is Sovereign Over . . .

Seemingly random things:

The lot is cast into the lap,
but its every decision is from the LORD.
(
Proverbs 16:33)

The heart of the most powerful person in the land:

The king’s heart is a stream of water in the hand of the LORD;
he turns it wherever he will.
(
Proverbs 21:1)

Our daily lives and plans:

A man’s steps are from the LORD;
how then can man understand his way?
(
Proverbs 20:24)

Many are the plans in the mind of a man,
but it is the purpose of the LORD that will stand.
(
Proverbs 19:21)

Come now, you who say, “Today or tomorrow we will go into such and such a town and spend a year there and trade and make a profit”—yet you do not know what tomorrow will bring. . . .  Instead you ought to say, “If the Lord wills, we will live and do this or that.”
(
James 4:13-15)

Salvation:

“I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy.
(
Romans 9:15-16)

As many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
(
Acts 13:48)

For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.
(
Romans 8:29-30)

Life and death:

See now that I, even I, am he,
and there is no god beside me;
I kill and I make alive;
I wound and I heal;
and there is none that can deliver out of my hand.
(
Deuteronomy 32:39)

The LORD kills and brings to life;
he brings down to Sheol and raises up.
(
1 Samuel 12:6)

Disabilities:

Then the LORD said to [Moses], “Who has made man’s mouth? Who makes him mute, or deaf, or seeing, or blind? Is it not I, the LORD?”
(
Exodus 4:11)

The death of God’s Son:

Jesus, [who was] delivered up according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you crucified and killed by the hands of lawless men.
(
Acts 2:23)

For truly in this city there were gathered together against your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, to do whatever your hand and your plan had predestined to take place.
(
Acts 4:27-28)

Yet it was the will of the LORD to crush him;
he has put him to grief. . . .
(
Isaiah 53:10)

Evil things:

Is a trumpet blown in a city,
and the people are not afraid?
Does disaster come to a city,
unless the LORD has done it?
(
Amos 3:6)

I form light and create darkness,
I make well-being and create calamity,
I am the LORD, who does all these things.
(
Isaiah 45:7)

“The LORD gave, and the LORD has taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD.” In all this Job did not sin or charge God with wrong. . . . “Shall we receive good from God, and shall we not receive evil?” In all this Job did not sin with his lips.
(
Job 1:21-22; 2:10)

[God] sent a man ahead of them, Joseph, who was sold as a slave. . . . As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be kept alive, as they are today.
(
Psalm 105:17; Genesis 50:21)

All things:

[God] works all things according to the counsel of his will.
(
Ephesians 1:11)

Our God is in the heavens;
he does all that he pleases.
(
Psalm 115:3)

I know that you can do all things,
and that no purpose of yours can be thwarted.
(
Job 42:2)

All the inhabitants of the earth are accounted as nothing,
and he does according to his will among the host of heaven
and among the inhabitants of the earth;
and none can stay his hand
or say to him, “What have you done?”
(
Daniel 4:35)

Wednesday, June 26, 2024

The False Promise of the "Sigma Male" and The Opportunity for Genuine Masculinity

 Social media platforms are full of content targeting young men who aspire to be self-described “Sigma Males.” YouTube, for instance, features videos with instructions, steps, and guides.

A recent column in the Guardian explored this phenomenon with the following description:

“You are a lone wolf. You are an independent thinker who makes his own rules. You are confident and competent. Women are drawn to you, but you don’t really care about them. Your day begins at 4:30 a.m. with a cold shower, followed by a punishing workout and an even more punishing skincare routine. You shun conventional career paths and run your own business, probably in crypto or real estate or vigilante crime fighting. You are that rarest of males—you are a sigma.”

The so-called “Sigma” life is just another model of masculinity in a culture where young men, many without positive male role models in their own lives, search for the meaning of life. Some of the content in these spaces is helpful, such as tips on exercise, diet, and finance. But often these pursuits become rabbit trails that lead to a twisting of masculinity into something that often celebrates misogyny, racism, and what Carl Trueman labels, “crudity, verbal thuggery ... and the frictionless kindergartens of social media bubbles.”

In the absence of wholesome models of masculinity, some Christian young men are retreating to these perpetually online embattlements, where they are imbibing a syncretistic mixture of Christianity and barbarism. Christian men with influence should warn those in danger of falling prey to Bronze Age Warlord style machismo while also recognizing the social and cultural void these self-styled online shock jocks are filling.

For too long, many of our institutions have subtly undermined the moral formation of young men. Radical feminism has depicted men as either bumbling moral midgets or toxic monsters. The rapid decline of marriage and church attendance has left generations of boys without any visible models of masculinity. As a result, this natural longing in a man’s heart to know and be known has them searching out less-than-ideal guidance on the meaning of life.

The Christian story has the answer for the redemption of young men. It reminds us that a fallen Adam will either shrink back in passivity or move forward in violence without the divine intervention of the Second Adam. In Christ, we not only see a model of masculinity that offers both a weeping friend and a crusading warrior, but a Savior who can turn corrupted male hearts into good men.

Christianity offers a pattern for healthy masculinity that differs from the world’s distorted facsimiles.

Christianity offers a pattern for healthy masculinity that differs from the world’s distorted facsimiles, and the Church should not shy away from aggressively presenting this vision to the men in our world who languish for hope. The paradox of Biblical manhood is that it is at the same time both tough and tender, resilient and relational, ambitious and yet servant-hearted. Consider some of the traits Paul urges his protégés to seek out in potential leaders: “temperate, not quick-tempered, sober, hospitable, respectable, not greedy, holy, above reproach, a good steward of his family (1 Timothy 3, Titus 1).” At the same time, he urges godly men to “stand firm in the faith (1 Corinthians 16)” and to “fight the good fight (1 Timothy 6:12).”

This kind of rich, Biblical vision for manhood is less thrilling than the social media warriors and YouTube provocateurs might portray. But real men are not cosplaying civil war online or flexing for Instagram because they are too busy reading to their children, driving the family minivan to church, or working with their hands to provide for the ones they love.

The most masculine man I know—my father—has never once posted a workout video and wouldn’t know Andrew Tate from Andrew Jackson. He offered something better: a real man who got up early every day and went to work, involved his family in the life of the church, and was faithful to my late mother. I’ve realized his life is a gift that many young boys never had. And thus they search for masculinity in the fever swamps.

America has a manhood crisis that only Christianity can solve. So while we warn of the dangers of faux masculinity models, let’s not shy away from boldly presenting to our boys the goodness, and the responsibilities, of being men. 

 

Daniel Darling is director of the Land Center for Cultural Engagement at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. His forthcoming book is Agents of Grace. He is also a bestselling author of several other books, including The Original Jesus, The Dignity Revolution, The Characters of Christmas, The Characters of Easter, and A Way With Words and the host of a popular weekly podcast, The Way Home. Dan holds a bachelor’s degree in pastoral ministry from Dayspring Bible College, has studied at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, and is a graduate of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He and his wife Angela have four children. Daniel Darling

Monday, June 3, 2024

The Deceit, Deception of June "Pride Month"

It’s June, and for the next 30 days, we will be inundated with our country’s month long celebration of pride.

We will see it everywhere. It will be pervasive. The rainbow’s ever-increasing colors will be inescapable. We will see it in the news. We’ll see it at Target. We’ll see it in Walmart. We’ll see it in our public parks and at our schools. We’ll see it in our theaters. We’ll see it on T-shirts, umbrellas, bumper stickers, and even at our churches.

Pride, pride, pride! This is the singular message that silences all others. Say it with me and say it over and over again: “We are loud and are proud!” If you refuse to do so, you’re a bigot.

In case you’ve forgotten, up until about five minutes ago, in the course of human history, pride was listed as one of the seven deadly sins. But that is no longer the case. Rather than being considered sacrilege, pride is now sanctified. Pride has become America’s ultimate virtue. Pride is now our nation’s summum bonum. Pride is our highest good. Not courage. Not chivalry. Not modesty, maternity, sacrifice, chastity, family or fatherhood. Not confession or repentance, but pride. Pride is our trump card against all other hands.

It’s almost as if we are listening to Michael Douglas paraphrasing his infamous speech in the 1987 movie “Wall Street,” whereby his character, Gordon Gekko, elevated another of the seven deadly sins, greed, to a virtue.

Can you hear him? “The point is, ladies and gentlemen, that pride, for lack of a better word, is good. Pride is right. Pride works. Pride clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Pride in all its forms has marked the upward surge of mankind, and pride, you mark my words, will save the United States of America.”

Nearly 100 years ago, G.K. Chesterton wrote that if he had “only one sermon to preach, it would be a sermon against pride.” Pride, he said, “is a poison so very poisonous that it not only poisons the virtues; it even poisons the other vices.”

He went on: “It is amazing to me that [we] really have so very little to say about the cause and cure of a moral condition that poisons nearly every family and every circle of friends. There is hardly [anyone] who has anything to say about it that is half so illuminating as the literal exactitude of the old maxim of the priest: that pride is from hell.”

Chaucer once said, “The root of all these seven [deadly] sins is pride: the general root of all harms.” Augustine added that pride is “inordinately enamored with its own power [and] despises the more just dominion of a higher authority.” St. James added that “God opposes the proud,” and Solomon said, “Pride goes before destruction. … God detests all the proud.”

C.S. Lewis tied it all together in his book “Perelandra.”

“Pride,” he said, “leads to every other vice. Pride is the complete anti-God state of mind. Pride ultimately leads all who embrace it to declare, ‘I am it. I am the universe. I am your God.’”

Any nation that devotes an entire month to glorifying pride is one teetering on the edge of disaster. We now stand divided rather than united because of our arrogance, our hubris, our defiance, our pride. As Pogo stated in 1970, “We have met the enemy, and he is us.”

As you watch the daily news — news of antisemitism and racial disdain, news of colleges collapsing under the weight of their ideological nihilism, news of our borders being invaded because we no longer have borders, news of lawfare under the guise of law, news of men pretending to be women and women pretending not to care — remember that this is not a time to be proud of who we are but to be humiliated by what we have become.

In 1863, when America was on the verge of collapse, as many fear we are today, Abraham Lincoln didn’t call for a day of “pride,” but rather one of “national humiliation.” After pleading with Americans to repent of their cultural, personal and collective sins, he concluded: “Let us then rest humbly in the hope … that the united cry of the Nation will be heard on high and answered with … the restoration of our now divided and suffering Country, to its former happy condition of unity and peace.”

“Humiliation for our divided and suffering country.” Amen, President Lincoln. Amen.

• Everett Piper (dreverettpiper.com, @dreverettpiper), a columnist for The Washington Times, is a former university president and radio host.

 

Wednesday, May 29, 2024

D-Day and the Devil

Jesus triumphed over the devil on the Cross. And yet Satan is still wreaking havoc on planet earth. So how can Satan be defeated and yet still be stealing, killing, and destroying? 

June 6 marks D-Day - the day that the Allies established a beachhead on the European mainland in Normandy, France. Looking back in history, war historians say at that point — when D-Day was successful — the Allies won the war. The moment they established a beachhead on the European mainland, they broke the back of the Germans. So war historians say that the Allies won the war — in principle — on D-Day. On June 6, 1944. 

But the Allies victory was not fully realized until VE-Day. VE stands for “Victory in Europe” and that took place 11 months later on May 8, 1945. 

On D-Day, the defeat of Nazis was a foregone conclusion. On D-Day the war was over (in principle), but there was lots of fighting between D-Day and VE-Day. There was tons of bloodshed before the actual surrender of the Germans. In fact, some of the bloodiest battles of World War II occurred between D-Day and VE-Day. Germany was a defeated enemy, but they weren’t going down without a fight. The Germans fought fiercely but fought a losing battle. 

On D-Day the Germans were defeated but that defeat was not fully realized until VE-Day. 

You and I are living in between God’s D-Day and His VE-Day, in-between the Resurrection and the Second Coming of Christ. When Jesus died on the Cross after declaring “It is finished!” (our debt was paid; his saving mission accomplished). Then in public display and validation of his finished work, he rose from the dead – conquering sin and death. — that was God’s D-Day. And when the Second Coming of Christ happens — that will be God’s VE-Day. 

So we are living in the time between the times, between God’s D-Day and VE-Day. Already but not yet - We are “already” in the God’s kingdom and its blessings, but we do “not yet” see it in the fullness of its glory and blessings. 

Because of D-Day, Satan is a defeated enemy. Speaking of what happened on Good Friday, Paul writes:

"God stripped the spiritual rulers and powers of their authority. With the cross, he won the victory and showed the world that they were powerless." (Colossians 2:15) 

Because of God’s D-Day, Satan is a defeated enemy. Jesus won the victory. But just like the Germans, Satan is not raising the white flag of surrender. One day in the future Satan will be destroyed: And the devil, who deceived them, was thrown into the lake of burning sulfur, where the beast and the false prophet had been thrown. They will be tormented day and night for ever and ever. (Revelation 20:10). 

Paul wrote 20 years after the Cross and Empty Tomb: The devil who rules this world has blinded the minds of those who do not believe (2 Corinthians 4:4 NCV). Two decades after Jesus’ death and resurrection, Paul describes Satan as the one who is still ruling planet earth! (see also 1 John 5:19 and Ephesians 2:2). 

In Mere Christianity C.S. Lewis wrote, 

“One of the things that surprised me when I first read the New Testament seriously was that it talked about a Dark Power in the universe – a mighty evil spirit who was . . . behind death and disease and sin . . . Christianity agrees . . . the universe is at war . . . and we are living in a part of the universe that is occupied by the rebel. Enemy-occupied territory – that is what this world is. Christianity is the story of how the rightful king has landed, you might say landed in disguise, and is calling us all to take part in a great campaign of sabotage. When you go to church you are really listening--in to the secret wireless from our friends: that is why the enemy is so anxious to prevent us from going.

One day Satan will be destroyed. God’s D-Day ensured this victory. But we are living between D-Day and VE-Day in the equivalent of war-torn France during the height of World War II. Satan is a defeated enemy. But he is not going down without a fight. 

One day Satan will be destroyed. God’s D-Day ensured this victory. But we are living between D-Day and VE-Day in the equivalent of war-torn France during the height of World War II.

Satan is a defeated enemy. But he is not going down without a fight.

Thx Oscar Cullman, Donald Carson, Dan Kopp

 

Friday, May 10, 2024

Is Jesus Your Lord or Your Advisor?

Tim Keller once said that our society determines what is right and wrong based on two questions: 

1. Do I want to do it? and 

2. Does it hurt anybody? 

And if the answer to the first question is “yes,” and the answer to the second is “no,” then it can’t possibly be wrong. It’s a simple enough rubric, but it’s terribly incomplete.

Would life be better if all of us tried to avoid hurting each other? Certainly. Is that the sum total of right and wrong? Hardly. We have this assumption in modern society—even in the church—that if we feel like we don’t see the wrong in something, it can’t possibly be wrong. 

I literally talk to people all the time—again, in the church—who say things like this. They explain away God’s laws by appealing to their own felt sense of right and wrong: Seems fine to me, so it must be okay! But here’s the deal: God’s way isn’t our way, and when he declares something wrong, it’s wrong—no matter how we rationalize it. 

It’s important for us to remember that when God declares something wrong, it’s not arbitrary—like filling out the wrong tax form or parking in a “no parking” zone. God declares wrong wrong because, ultimately, it’s harmful. Sometimes we can see that harm: God tells us not to murder because murder takes someone else’s life; God tells us not to lie because it hurts others to withhold the truth from them. The trouble is, we simply don’t have enough knowledge to be able to see the consequences all the time. If we go through life evaluating moral choices based on whether we think it does or doesn’t hurt somebody, we are assuming God-like knowledge for ourselves. And in case you haven’t noticed, you and I aren’t God. 

Think about a 7-year-old who sees nothing wrong with watching YouTube for 11 hours straight and eating Oreos for every meal. He likes watching cat videos. And Oreos taste great. Nothing seems off to him. But most of us adults would recognize that these aren’t healthy habits. We could try to explain our reasoning to our second-grader (we probably should), and he might grasp it. But he might not: It’s just tougher for him to see because he lacks life experience and wisdom. 

So let me ask you: Is there a bigger gap between your wisdom and that of your 7-year-old, or between God’s wisdom and yours? Toward the end of King David’s life, we read about a census he initiated. For readers like you and me, we probably don’t see much wrong with a census. It seems harmless, responsible even, from the outside. God isn’t always opposed to census-taking. But God had said not to take this one. Which meant that this census wasn’t responsible and harmless; it was a sin. 

 Joab, the commander of Israel’s armies, even called David out, saying, “‘May the LORD your God add to the people a hundred times as many as they are, while the eyes of my lord the king still see it, but why does my lord the king delight in this thing?’” (2 Samuel 24:3 ESV). David’s motivations for the census, it seems, were all wrong. It was about pride, security, and aggression—not obedience to God. David pushed through Joab’s objection and completed the census anyway. But afterward, David was convicted. Scripture says, “But David’s heart struck him after he had numbered the people. And David said to the LORD, ‘I have sinned greatly in what I have done. But now, O LORD, please take away the iniquity of your servant, for I have done very foolishly’” (2 Samuel 24:10). 

Was the problem here David’s pride and security in his own numbers? That was part of it, I think. David should have been finding his security in God. But the bigger issue is that David decided he knew best based on what seemed best to him. God’s law felt arbitrary, so David gave himself permission to ignore it. Who is best to determine what humanity really needs? Us or our Creator? 

To act like we know what is best for ourselves and a society based on our limited knowledge is the height of pride. If we only obey Jesus when he makes sense to us, then he’s not our Lord; he’s our advisor. Obeying God only when he makes sense to us is not obedience; it’s agreement. Have we invited God to submit his suggestions to us for consideration, or have we submitted ourselves to him because he’s God, who reigns and knows what is best? If we only obey Jesus when he makes sense to us, then he’s not our Lord; he’s our advisor. 

The post "Is Jesus Your Lord or Your Advisor?" appeared first on JD Greear Ministries

Wednesday, May 1, 2024

Men are Disconnected from the Bible and Need to Return

Evangelical publisher Robert Wolgemuth says one problem with Christianity in the U.S. is men — not what they’re doing but what they are not doing. 

“American men are tragically biblically illiterate, even guys that have gone to church all their lives,” said Mr. Wolgemuth, author and editor of more than 20 books, including “Dad’s Devotional Bible.” “And many men are very daunted by this book, overwhelmed by it.” 

Many Christian scholars and writers regard reading the Bible and understanding its message as essential for spiritual growth, but the American Bible Society’s most recent State of the Bible survey found that 59% of men say they are “disengaged” from Scripture and only 15% say they are actively engaged with the Bible. 

Why aren’t men accessing the Scriptures as they once did? Timothy Spivey, vice president for spiritual life at Pepperdine University in Malibu, California, said part of the answer lies with the rising generation of men. 

“In the 1990s, when I was a student, it was a more traditional era. Spiritual leadership on the campus was largely (but not exclusively) male back then — in concert with the traditional norms of that time,” he said. “Many 18-year-old young men today are living in a different era that doesn’t equip them as well to build relationships in the same way that people used to.”

Mr. Spivey said young adults need help developing close friendships. 

“I think it’s harder and harder for young people, male or female, to build friendships that transcend [the] social chaos around them,” he said. “So, the more we can help young men find each other relationally and build real friendships, that’s an enormously helpful thing.” 

Friendships and engagement with the Bible can help young men who either lack a male role model at home or have been bombarded with sitcoms and movies showing fathers as bumbling, inept characters. 

“Many did not grow up with a father in the home,” Mr. Spivey said. “The stereotypes offered in media are terrible. So, where can they find examples of what a godly man looks like? In church, certainly, but even more in Scripture. Scripture is also a place that provides examples of how men sin and find redemption.” 

As those men move into marriage and family life, they may face other challenges, said Jamie Tuttle, lead pastor of Dwelling Place Church in Cleveland, Tennessee. He said men are sometimes driven from the “spiritual leadership guidance role” that God intended, perhaps believing that providing for the family is all that’s required. 

“There’s a battle of good and evil, and evil is fighting for the souls of men because men are the foundation of the growth of the family,” said Mr. Tuttle, whose annual King’s Table conferences aim to instruct men in their responsibilities. 

Too many men believe that once they accept Christ as their savior, they can leave the spiritual management of the family to their wives, but that’s not what the Bible intends, he said. Women are crucial to the equation, but a father’s leadership is essential. 

“I believe that men need to be brought to the realization and even the revelation that ‘I have a major calling and purpose on my life’ outside of just saying, ‘I’ve got my heaven ticket,’” Mr. Tuttle said. 

Willie Robertson, who starred in A&E’s “Duck Dynasty” reality TV series with his family, said men often don’t know what to do with their Christianity once they accept the Lord. 

“I think some people may come to faith or think that they’ve come to faith and no one ever explained … what exactly the mission is,” 

Mr. Robertson said. “I think we have men who were, they’re kind of ‘missionless,’ they’re like, ‘Something happened. Maybe I raised my hand, and I said, ‘This sounds good to me, but no one ever explained to me exactly what exactly I’m doing and what I’m supposed to do and how I’m supposed to live and all that.” 

He said a solution is to ask men to tell their stories and share how their lives have been shaped. He then presents the Gospel as the “good news” for those who have tried everything else and outlines what a Christian life entails. Some may reject it, but others will accept it while understanding their future spiritual responsibilities. 

Next month, Mr. Robertson will publish “Gospeler: Turning Darkness Into Light One Conversation at a Time,” a book that explores the need to evangelize and disciple people in their new beliefs. 

Mr. Wolgemuth has sought to “make the Bible more accessible” to men. He was general editor for the “Men’s Daily Bible,” which includes the full text of Scripture, articles for men from noted Christian leaders and 260 devotional articles designed to be read Monday through Friday. 

He said responses to the new volume have been positive. 

“My favorite is a woman who gives this thing to her husband and says, ‘I’ve never seen him sit down with the Bible in our marriage.’ This is good,” Mr. Wolgemuth said. 

• Mark A. Kellner can be reached at mkellner@washingtontimes.com

Tuesday, April 30, 2024

If You Draw Men with a "Circus" Conference, You Have to Keep Drawing Them with "Circus" Conferences

Last week, a moment at a men's event in Springfield, Missouri, went viral. Opening the Stronger Men's Conference was professional sword-swallower and go-go dancer Alex Magala—a two-time Guinness World Record holder, Olympic Games Opening Ceremony performer, and America's Got Talent champion. 

Magala [and the conference] made headlines when Pastor Mark Driscoll, speaking at the conference, publicly rebuked his [Magala's] performance, describing it as a "strip club" act. Regarding Magala's performance, Driscoll told conference attendees that a "Jezebel spirit opened our event." He compared the performance to Old Testament pagan idol worship. At that point, event organizer John Lindell, lead pastor of the James River Church in Missouri, could be heard calling Driscoll's name and telling him that he [Driscoll] was "out of line." Lindell then says, "You're [Driscoll] done," to which Driscoll promptly leaves the stage. Disorder ensues as the crowd erupts, some applauding Driscoll's departure and many chanting, "Bring him back!" Later in the conference, Lindell and Driscoll come out on stage to reconcile. 

Since the event, the evangelical world has been up in arms, asking who was right and who was wrong. And, per usual, we are asking the wrong question. 

Whether Driscoll should have publicly rebuked the performance is irrelevant. The question we should be asking is, "What are we doing?" 

Is this what men need? 

What does a sword-swallower have to do with biblical manhood and masculinity in the first place? 

The Stronger Men's event is no stranger to spectacle—two years ago, the conference opened with Chuck Norris driving a tank through the arena. The crowd went bananas (for the record, I love Chuck Norris, the GOAT of 80's action films). 

 I want to remind Driscoll, Lindell, and the other event organizers of something Charles Spurgeon said centuries ago: "If you have to give a carnival to get people to come to church, then you will have to keep giving carnivals to keep them coming back." 

In other words, what you win men with is what you win men to. 

What Men Need 

 Men need God's Word, and men need other men. Anything that detracts from His Word and the community of other men is vain and possibly dangerous. 

At some point, we men's leaders must accept that we will not entertain men into Christ-likeness. Jake Paul is far more provoking than the Church will ever be, which is fine. As a man wanting to be more like King Jesus, I don't need Jake Paul; I need the Apostle Paul. 

And listen, I get it. Tyson v. Jake Paul will draw infinitely more men than a conference on Ephesians 5. Honestly, I'll probably tune in on July 20 to watch Tyson destroy Paul—the pinnacle of entertainment. What I don't need is Jake Paul [or Alex Magala, for that matter] headlining my spiritual development. I need God's Word and a community of older, wiser, faithful men showing me the way. 

Today, men are confused. We are more biblically illiterate and lonelier than ever. This is not by chance. For decades, the Church has been serving men wild game and sideshow acts in hopes of... honestly, I am not sure what we hoped to accomplish. What we have managed to do is become a spectacle. Those watching the Stronger Men's debacle see this circus act and think, "Is this what Biblical masculinity is all about? Christ lived, died, and rose for go-go dancing and 80's movie stars driving decommissioned army tanks?" 

Is it any wonder we can't get men to follow Jesus wholeheartedly? 

My advice. Ditch the circus acts. Give men what they need: God’s Word and community. God's Word and community. Will that sell out an arena? Probably not. But that's okay. Honestly, we have to be careful with large religious crowds—it was a large religious crowd that crucified Jesus. Give me a faithful few. After all, it was one Man who saved the world and twelve men who changed it. 

By Dr. Chris Harper, betterman.com
Chris (harp) is author, speaker, and disciple-maker, and serves as BetterMan's Chief Storyteller and CEO (April 22, 2024)

Monday, April 15, 2024

Remembering Jackie Robinson and His Faith in Christ

Major League Baseball today remembers and honors Jackie Robinson one of the greatest players to ever play the sport. Every April 15th every major league player wears the number 42 to honor what Jackie struggled through and achieved during his life. We remember him as brother in Christ! 

Brooklyn Dodgers President Branch Rickey and Jackie Robinson, the shortstop of the Kansas City Monarchs of the Negro American League, first met the morning of August 28, 1945, in Rickey’s fourth-floor office at 215 Montague Street in Brooklyn, New York. 

Clyde Sukeforth, a Brooklyn scout, told Robinson that Rickey was interested in signing the ballplayer for a Black team he was organizing, the Brooklyn Brown Dodgers. 

Rickey’s interest in a Black team, however, was a smokescreen to hide his intention of ending the national pastime’s color barrier by identifying talented players in Black baseball. His scouts recommended Robinson and other ballplayers for the Brooklyn Dodgers organization.1 

Rickey had examined every part of Robinson’s life, including his time at UCLA, where he had been a four-sport athlete; in the US Army, where he had been court-martialed for protesting after he had been sent to back of a bus; and with the Monarchs in the Negro leagues.2 

Rickey was impressed with Robinson’s athleticism but was worried about reports of the ballplayer’s temper and whether he could control it in response to what would be an unceasing amount of physical and emotional abuse from fans and players on opposing teams. If Robinson lost his temper, it would give his critics reason to confirm their belief that Blacks should not be allowed in the game. 

“I’m looking for a ballplayer with the guts not to fight back,” Rickey told Robinson. Rickey wanted to find out for himself how Robinson would respond to such indignities. He decided to test Robinson. Rickey took off his sport coat and transformed himself into a bigoted White clerk refusing Robinson a room in a Whites-only hotel; a White waiter in a restaurant denying Robinson service and calling him “boy”; and an opposing ballplayer who, as Robinson later remember, criticized “my race, my parents, in language that was almost unendurable.” And finally, Rickey was a foul-mouthed base stealer sliding hard into Robinson with his metal spikes high in the air. Rickey then swung his fist at Robinson’s head, calling him a racist epithet.3 

Rickey then opened a book published in the 1920s, Giovanni Papini’s Life of Christ, and read Jesus’ words from the Sermon on the Mountain in the Gospel of Matthew: “You have heard that it hath been said, an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil; but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.” 

Robinson knew the Gospel and knew what was required of him. 

“I have two cheeks, Mr. Rickey. Is that it?” he replied.4 

The meeting between the two Methodists, Rickey and Robinson, ultimately transformed baseball and America itself. “Robinson’s a Methodist. I’m a Methodist. God’s a Methodist,” Rickey says. “You can’t go wrong.” 

The exchange is included in 42, the movie starring Chadwick Boseman, as Robinson, and Harrison Ford as Rickey. What is often overlooked in books, articles, documentaries, and movies about Robinson’s life is that it is also a religious story. His faith in God, as he often said, carried him through the pain and anguish of integrating the major leagues. 

Michael Long and I wrote about Robinson and his faith in the 2017 book Jackie Robinson: A Spiritual Biography, which was published by Westminster John Knox Press.5 

The book begins with Robinson’s birth on January 31, 1919. As Jackie’s mother, Mallie, held her newborn son, she looked at her husband, Jerry, her brother, and her brother-in-law trying to make “sugar teats” – lard and sugar wrapped in cheesecloth to resemble nipples that would ease the baby’s assimilation into the world. Mallie slowly shook her head as she watched the hapless men spill most of the lard on the floor and then whispered a blessing to Jackie. “Bless you, my boy,” she said. “For you to survive all this, God will have to keep his eye on you.”6 Shortly after Jackie’s birth, Jerry Robinson hopped a train with another woman. Mallie found herself alone to support five children in rural Cairo, Georgia, in the hostile South, where Blacks had few opportunities, if any, to improve their standing, and any Black who confronted racial injustice ran the risk of ending up in jail, beaten, or lynched.7 

In May 1920, Rachel moved her family to Pasadena, California, where she repeatedly told Jackie and his four siblings that God would take care of them.8 

Jackie, however, did not yet have his mother’s faith or the strength to turn the other cheek. The Robinsons were the only Black family living on Pepper Street and their White neighbors made no effort to welcome them. When Jackie was 8, a girl who lived across Pepper Street from the Robinsons, called him a nigger. Jackie yelled back at her that she was “nothing but a cracker.” The girl’s father came outside the house and threw a rock at Jackie, who returned fire with a rock of his own.9 

As a teenager, Jackie refused to go with his mother to Scott Methodist Church. He belonged to a neighborhood gang, the Pepper Street Gang, which consisted not of violent boys and men as the word conjures up today but of boys who shoplifted from local grocers and got into fights with other teens.10 The boys’ petty crimes got them in trouble with the police. This increased Mallie’s concern about her son. 

She expressed his worries to the Rev. Karl Downs, the young minister at Scott Methodist. Downs found Robinson on a Pasadena street corner, told him to come see him, and persuaded him to come to church.11 Arnold Rampersad wrote in his biography of Robinson that Downs, who was just seven years older, became a good friend and a father figure to Robinson. His impact on Robinson was particularly significant 

when it came to shaping the young man’s religion. 

Rampersad said that Downs became the channel through which religious faith “finally flowed into Jack’s consciousness and was finally accepted there, if on revised terms, as he reached manhood,” Rampersad said. “Faith in God then began to register in him as both a mysterious force, beyond his comprehension, and a pragmatic way to negotiate the world.”12 

At Downs’s request, Robinson began teaching Sunday school – even on the mornings after football games he played at Pasadena Junior College and then at UCLA. “On Sunday mornings, when I woke up sore and aching because of a football game the day before, I yearned to just stay in bed. But no matter how terrible I felt, I had to get up.”13 

Robinson made a habit of praying beside his bed before going to sleep. Robinson learned that exercising faith was not just about praying. Downs instilled in Robinson the pride in being a Black man in a White-dominated world and in standing up to social injustice in a world where there was so much racial injustice. Robinson carried himself with pride. He wore White shirts that showed off his dark skin.14 

Rachel Isum, who was three years behind Robinson at UCLA, was attracted to Robinson’s handsome looks but also to his self-confidence. Robinson and Isum, who were both Methodists, began dating and remained a couple until his death in 1972. 

Robinson’s faith gave him strength during his court-martial in the Army in 1944. He was drafted in March 1942, three months after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, bringing the United States into World War II. Robinson, like most, if not every other Black soldier, faced racial discrimination in the Army. Bases were largely segregated but segregation was prohibited on military buses. 

While stationed at Fort Hood in Texas, a bus driver ordered Robinson to the back of a bus. Robinson knew he didn’t have to move and did not move. An argument followed. The base assistant provost conducted an inquiry, interviewing the bus driver, White passengers, and White MPs, but ignoring Robinson. Robinson, who felt he was not given the respect demanded of an officer, interrupted the questioning. He was accused of not showing proper respect to a commandeering officer. If found guilty, he could be sentenced to a military prison. As Robinson sat in shackles in the courtroom, he relied on his faith in God, remembering his mother’s words. “You are a child of God, made in God’s image. Because God is there, nothing can go wrong with you,” she had told him. “You can allow yourself to take risks because you just know that the Lord will not allow you to sink so far that you can’t swim.”15 

Robinson was acquitted of all charges. By the time of the acquittal, Robinson’s battalion had left for Europe, where it fought in the bloody Battle of the Bulge. By confronting racial discrimination at Fort Hood, he was prevented from going abroad where he might have been injured or killed. Robinson was discharged and began playing in the segregated Negro leagues, where he was playing when Branch Rickey was searching for the right player to break baseball’s color barrier. By confronting racial discrimination in the Army, he would be available to confront racial discrimination in baseball. 

Robinson did not like playing in Negro leagues. He did not like the catch-as-catch-all playing schedule or the constant traveling where they might play games in two different cities on the same day and couldn’t stay in Whites-only hotels or eat in Whites-only restaurants. He did not drink alcohol or chase women as many of his teammates did. Robinson openly scorned his whiskey-drinking and promiscuous teammates, once tossing a glass of scotch into a burning fireplace to demonstrate the lethality of liquor. He stunned his teammates by telling them he was waiting until marriage to have sex. 

“His sense of self was tightly wound around core values of dignity and self-esteem, and he believed in God and the Bible,” Rampersad wrote about Robinson. “Absurdly or not, he drew a line in the dirt between himself and sin, and tried not to cross it.”16 As influential as Karl Downs was in Robinson’s life, no one had a more profound impact on Robinson than Rickey. Rickey too owed his strong sense of faith to his mother, Emily, who taught him stories from the Bible. 

Rickey biographer Lee Lowenfish said Emily Rickey’s stories from Scripture reinforced in her son “the belief that there was a right way and a wrong way to life.”17 This meant that God came first to Rickey, whose religious devotion was such that he didn’t attend baseball games on Sundays. 

Rickey and Robinson forever changed baseball and society on October 23, 1945, when the Montreal Royals, the Triple-A team in the Brooklyn organization, announced it had signed Robinson. Robinson knew that much of White America would judge all Blacks by how well he played and how well he comported himself. If he failed in either way, his failure reflected badly on all Blacks. Robinson’s first test came when Jackie and Rachel, having just married, left Southern California for the Deep South, where Jackie would try to win a spot on the Montreal roster during spring training in Florida. The Robinson were bumped from two planes and replaced by White passengers. Shortly after they boarded a bus near Pensacola, a bus driver, calling Jackie “boy,” ordered the newlyweds to the back of the bus. Jackie turned his cheek both times.18 

Robinson was chased out of Sanford, Florida, by the Ku Klux Klan. A number of cities refused to allow the integrated Montreal team to play. Robinson struggled with his hitting and he injured his throwing arm. Robinson played his first game of the spring in Daytona Beach on Sunday, March 17.19 Black ministers gave sermons about Robinson that morning and asked their parishioners to pray for him. When services ended, Blacks, in their Sunday clothes, walked to the ballpark.20 What happened in Daytona Beach repeated itself elsewhere in cities where Robinson played. “I know how wonderful it felt on a number of occasions, when a Negro minister approached me at the ball club and said, ‘You know, I cut my sermon short today so the people could get out of church early and get to the ball park to root for you,’” Robinson said. “My minister friends tell me that when the average minister cuts down his sermon, he is making one of the greatest sacrifices known to man.” Robinson credited Black ministers for his success. “I owe so much to the Negro ministers, and it is a debt I never intend to forget.”21 

Robinson played the 1946 season with the Montreal Royals and was then promoted to the Dodgers the following spring. He knew that if he succeeded in the major leagues, he would change the way a lot of Whites thought about Blacks. If he succeeded, it would mean that other Blacks would get opportunities that were now closed to them. If he could overcome racial discrimination, then others could, too.22 

No athlete ever faced either the pressure or abuse that Robinson did when he took the field for the first time in a Brooklyn uniform on April 15, 1947. Robinson clearly understood the stakes at play. Robinson knew Rickey could only do so much and that his own success depended on his own ability, but also providence. “His religion had taught him that the line between confidence and Satanic pride is a fine one; – a twisted ankle, a turned knee – might yet intervene to reassert the inscrutable ways of Providence,” Rampersad wrote. “The drama would unfold; he would be both spectator and the man at the plate; God would decide the outcome.”23 

Robinson believed that God was on his side.24 

Robinson did not merely endure in the face of constant death threats, opposing pitchers throwing at him, base runners spiking him, or fans screaming the ugliest of racial epithets; he thrived. His faith formed in him an indomitable spirit. Robinson promised Rickey he would respond to his detractors by turning the other cheek, and he did. “In observing that trust,” Rickey said, “he has had an almost Christ-like taste of turning the other cheek.”25 

Robinson continued with his nightly ritual of praying, once telling a reporter about his faith in God and his nightly ritual of kneeling at his bedside. “It’s the best way to get closer to God,” Robinson said, and then the second baseman added with a smile, “and a hard-hit ground ball.” 

After Robinson retired from baseball, he wrote newspaper columns for the New York Post and the Amsterdam News in New York. Many of the columns are collected in the book Beyond Home Plate, which is edited by Michael Long. In one column, Robinson compared his own experience with “turning the other cheek” with the nonviolent confrontation of the civil-rights movement espoused by his friend, Martin Luther King Jr. “I can testify to the fact that it was a lot harder to turn the other cheek and refuse to fight back than it would have been to exercise a normal reaction,” 

Robinson wrote. “But it works, because sooner or later it brings a sense of shame to those who attack you. And that sense of shame is often the beginning of progress.”26 

CHRIS LAMB is chair of the journalism and public-relations department at Indiana University- Indianapolis. He is the author of 11 books, including Blackout: The Untold Story of Jackie Robinson’s First Spring Training; Conspiracy of Silence: Sportswriters and the Long Campaign to Desegregate Baseball; Jackie Robinson: A Spiritual Biography; and, most recently, Sports Journalism: A History of Glory, Fame, and Technology.  

Notes 

1 Lee Lowenfish, Branch Rickey: Baseball’s Ferocious Gentleman (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2007), 373-374. Arnold Rampersad, Jackie Robinson: A Biography (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1997), 125-126. 

2 Lowenfish, 368-369. 

3 Rampersad, 127. 

4 Lowenfish, 375-376; Rampersad, 127. 

5 Michael Long and Chris Lamb, Jackie Robinson: A Spiritual Biography (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2017). 

6 Long and Lamb, 13. 

7 Long and Lamb, 18. 

8 Long and Lamb, 18. 

9 Rampersad, 24. 

10 Long and Lamb, 23-24. 

11 Long and Lamb, 25. 

12 Rampersad, 53. 

13 Jackie Robinson and Alfred Duckett, I Never Had It Made (Hopewell, New Jersey: Ecco Press, 1972), 8. 

14 Long and Lamb, 34-36. 

 15 Rampersad, 102-111. 

16 Rampersad, 118. 

17 Lowenfish, 

18 Chris Lamb, Blackout: The Untold Story of Jackie Robinson’s First Spring Training (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2012), 5-14. 

19 Lamb, Blackout, 87-89, 94-95, 103, 135, 140.

 20 Lamb, Blackout, 104, 105. 

21 Long and Lamb, 75. 

22 Long and Lamb, 84. 

23 Rampersad, 168. 

24 Long and Lamb, 85. 

25 Wendell Smith, “Sports Beat,” Pittsburgh Courier, February 28, 1948. Quoted in Long and Lamb, 98. 

26 Chris Lamb, “Jackie Robinson: Faith in Himself and in God,” Wall Street Journal, April 11, 2013.