Wednesday, February 25, 2026

Biblical Masculinity is Sacrificial Responsibility under God, Carried Out in Ordinary Obedience that Rarely Draws Applause

As G. K. Chesterton once warned, men are being discipled with their feet firmly planted in midair, as G.
K. Chesterton once warned. When you’re trained to live suspended between contradictions, you don’t move forward with confidence. You drift wherever the cultural winds happen to blow.

The air we’re breathing right now is confused, and that confusion shapes how men think about themselves, their homes, and their responsibilities. It presses in quietly at first, then loudly, until many men no longer know what obedience even looks like.

It began in a garden, long before there were headlines to argue over or trends to follow. Genesis shows us a good design at the beginning. God created man and woman in His image, different by design and meant to complement one another in ordered harmony.

Then the order fractured in a way that still echoes today. Eve stepped into leadership God had not given her, and Adam stepped back from leadership God had commanded him to carry. When it all fell apart, Adam did not bear the weight of his failure and instead pushed responsibility onto his wife.

Sin did not erase what God made good. It bent it out of shape and twisted what was meant to function in harmony into a pattern of conflict. The design remained, but it was no longer operating as it should.

That distortion shows up in predictable ways. Women are tempted toward control, and men are tempted toward abdication and blame. We see the pattern everywhere because the pattern has been with us from the beginning.

This tension did not originate in culture. Culture amplifies what the Fall introduced and then sells it back to us as progress. A feminized world is not the result of strong women, but of sinful distortion in women and sinful abdication in men.

The answer to Adam’s failure is not better techniques or stronger personalities. It is a better Man who did not fail when obedience was costly. Where Adam stood silent, Christ spoke truth and stood firm.

Where Adam withdrew when responsibility pressed in, Christ stepped forward and embraced the cost of obedience. Where Adam blamed his bride, Christ bled for His bride. The contrast is not subtle, and it is meant to reshape how we think about leadership.

Christ restores manhood by reordering obedience, not by inflating ego or celebrating dominance. His model of strength is quiet endurance under the authority of the Father. He shows us that real leadership absorbs cost instead of shifting blame.

Men do not mature past the cross, and they do not outgrow their need for repentance. They grow by staying near it, returning again and again to the place where pride is put to death. Formation begins there and only continues if it remains anchored there.

Biblical masculinity is not domination. It is sacrificial responsibility under God, carried out in ordinary obedience that rarely draws applause. You do not learn manhood by watching culture, and you do not recover it by reacting to culture. You learn manhood by looking at Christ and ordering your life under His authority.

What Acting Like Men Actually Looks Like

Scripture is concrete about formation and does not leave masculinity in the realm of vague sentiment. It calls men to be watchful, to stand firm in the faith, to act like men, and to be strong. That is not bravado, but obedience with backbone.

Acting like men looks like paying attention to spiritual danger instead of drifting through temptation. It looks like standing firm when truth is unpopular and costly. It looks like leading in repentance before leading in direction.

It also looks like bearing weight instead of dodging it. It looks like choosing obedience when comfort would be easier and compromise would be rewarded. These habits are formed slowly through repeated, costly choices.

Men are not formed by comfort, and they are not strengthened by endless affirmation. They are formed by responsibility carried over time. You either take responsibility for your formation, or you allow the world to deform you into something weaker than you were meant to be.

The disorder we see around us did not start in courtrooms or classrooms, and it did not originate in political movements. It started in a garden when God’s order was rejected. That rejection still multiplies confusion wherever it takes root.

When God’s order is dismissed, confusion spreads into every sphere of life. When men abdicate their God-given role and responsibility, distortion follows close behind. The pattern is ancient, and the consequences are still with us.

The world does not need louder men who perform strength. It needs stronger men who practice obedience when no one is watching. It needs men who carry weight instead of performing outrage.

The call placed on men is simple in its clarity, but not easy in its cost. It requires watchfulness, firmness, and strength that grows through obedience. Stand watch, stand firm, act like men, be strong, and go and do likewise.

Note: This article is an adapted from a recent sermon by Virgil Walker


Tuesday, February 24, 2026

A New Heart – The Righteousness of Christ

When we despair of ourselves, we repent of these self-justifying schemes and allow
ourselves to be shaped by God, covered in Christ’s righteousness, and reborn with a new heart.

In an exchange with Erasmus of Rotterdam in 1525, the reformer Martin Luther debated the matter of free will with the great Humanist thinker. At the end of his treatise, De Servo Arbitrio [On the Captive Will], he told Erasmus, “You and you alone have seen the question on which everything hinges, and have aimed at the vital spot.” [1] For Luther, how you understand the human will is imperative for understanding how God works through the gospel to bring faith.

What does it mean to have a bound will? To answer this question, we must take a step back. For Luther, humans are creatures of the heart, that means that everyone is captivated by something or another. Whatever we make of the will, it is beholden to the heart. And this captivation is not an easy ride. The human heart is stormy, swaying under the spell of four different emotions:

A human heart is like a ship on a wild sea, driven by the storm winds from the four corners of the world. Here it is stuck with fear and worry about impending disaster; there comes grief and sadness because of present evil. Here breathes a breeze of hope and of anticipated happiness; there blows security and joy in present blessings. These storm winds teach us to speak with earnestness, to open the heart and pour out what lies at the bottom of it. [2]

For the Reformer, we are not natural born Stoics indifferent to our emotional reactions but instead we are creatures under the spell of our passions.

Whatever we think about the will, it is not neutral, like a customer choosing options in a big box store or a diner at a buffet line but instead as indebted to and driven by fear, grief, hope, and joy. But there is good news. The gospel comes to open our hearts, enjoy Christ, and liberate us from our defenses. Luther likened us to beasts of burden ridden by either God or the devil and our hearts as being controlled by the one holding the reins. Throughout the Scriptures we learn that God loves his own. Given that truth, our hearts should be captivated by God, but they become ensnared in idols, projections of our sense of value and worth. For the most part this projection is tied to merit. We use our idols to verify to our weak egos that we matter (see The Denial of Death by Ernst Becker).

All humans are captivated by something or another and look to that power to uphold them and validate the meaning of their lives

Preachers must be vigilant with how they address their hearers. Your hearers, of course, live in a context, whether a city, suburb, or the country, driven by a political stance, and beholden to whatever glitter or entertainment that captures them. To be sure, all humans are captivated by something or another and look to that power to uphold them and validate the meaning of their lives. All humans live from an ideal that gives them meaning. But there is evidence that purely secular approaches to establishing meaning, such as the quest for authenticity, are no longer working. Otherwise, why would so many be anxious and depressed?

In Luther’s day and in some versions of religion, it is impossible to untether “free will” from the attempt to acquire merit. In this perspective, Christ is, at best, an accessory. Speaking some years ago in a local church about the theology of the cross (for which Christ is never an add-on), a man countered me by saying, “You can talk all you wish about a theology of the cross, but I have landed a well-paying job, a great house in the burbs, and a beautiful wife. I just don’t experience a theology of the cross.” I instinctively replied, “take your pulse!”

Bound to Justify Yourself

All people with bound wills will look at Christ as an accessory. In Moralistic Therapeutic Deism, secular people evaluate religion in a twofold way: they see religion, first, as making people ethical and, second, as helping people emotionally. Now, this way of looking at religion reduces it to its utility. It has no sense of honoring God for his own sake and possibly little sense for loving your neighbors for their own sakes. But the gospel as a promise cannot be reduced to its usefulness. It is God’s means to rescue people from sin, death, and the devil. It is not translatable into a program to help us successfully navigate life, let alone accrue merit for eternal life. Of course, if our lives are grounded in the gospel, we can have access to the assurance that they are lived out wholly within God’s embrace. That can afford us a modicum of security in this life. The point is, whenever you preach, you are preaching to an audience of bound wills.

The gospel as a promise cannot be reduced to its usefulness. It is God’s means to rescue people from sin, death, and the devil.

How should that shape your preaching? All those to whom you preach are folks captivated by something or another. That means, everyone to whom you preach lives as if they have a crush on someone or something. (Do you remember the hold that crushes had on you when you were an adolescent?) We are creatures of desire. Augustine was right that our hearts are restless until they rest in God. That which we desire provides us with our sense of meaning, value, and purpose. Paradoxically, there is a sense that our desires choose us rather than we choose them. Not only do they choose us, but they possess us. Some years ago, a class gave me pushback that they were all individuals who “did their own thing.” My response to them was, if that is the case, then why are you all wearing the same designer label jeans? In their imaginations they were striving to be unique individuals and thereby become authentic. But what was really driving them was the unrecognized desire to fit in with their peers.

Luther taught that God’s law, if taken seriously, would prove to us our inability to keep it from the heart and so prevent us from using it to achieve merit. He showed that the law would give us “self-knowledge,” the awareness of our inability to make ourselves to be no longer incurvated, turned-in-on-ourselves, and love God for his own sake. The more the law hammers this truth home, the more likely we would despair of ourselves. Again, paradoxically, such self-despair is a good thing. It shows us that self-justification will never give us the security in our relationship with God that we crave. It shows us the futility of attempting to justify ourselves and so allows us to become open to God’s work on us. That is, God can really begin to work his mercy and goodness in Christ for you when you stop trying to prove your worth. We experience a “new intellect and will” giving us the power to “curb the flesh and to flee the righteousness and wisdom of the world.” [3] Of course, this means that Christian life is a battlefield between old and new.

There are a lot of ways that people use to justify themselves. As seen above, some might use their belief in their financial success at improving their relationship with God. Others might find their ultimate meaning in the politics which they hold dear. Others might find it in their success in whether they are movers and shakers in their place of employment or their families. In all these schemes, Christ is marginalized as an accessory. When we despair of ourselves, we repent of these self-justifying schemes and allow ourselves to be shaped by God, covered in Christ’s righteousness, and reborn with a new heart.

As Luther points out in his Postil for the 3rd Sunday after Easter, many of those to whom you preach wrestle with God in hiddenness. [4] They deal with the deus absconditus, perhaps even stronger, a Christus absconditus. Christ no longer seems present and kind. Instead, he seems to have disappeared. Such an absent Christ leaves us exposed to the law’s accusations of not living up to its goals. Many people suffering from the experience of an absent Christ find themselves caught or trapped in temptation, anxieties, adversities, and many forms of suffering. Christ is present as merciful when he is preached.

Preachers as Fools for Christ

Luther interprets this experience as a way by which God reinforces the reality that an exercise in our free will to secure our worth falters. Certainly, Luther is an advocate of good works. But works are only good when they are done neither from a slave mentality which fears punishment in hell nor from the quest to secure payment or reward in heaven like a hireling. Instead, works are good when we live to supply our neighbor’s needs and not use our neighbor for our own benefit. In faith, God’s love, which is ever gushing, flows through us to accomplish good in our various vocations in the world. When experiencing God in hiddenness, we discover that our works cannot secure Christ’s presence. Only the word can do that. Our wills may be bound to believe that through our choices we can accrue merit. But merit does not cut it with a God who is committed to be merciful. Echoing Paul, Luther believes we encounter our own foolishness in this thought. Yet Christians also embrace the foolishness of trusting in Christ alone: we become fools for Christ.

Again, as preachers your job is to hand over the goods. Give Christ to your people. Luther often preached as if his mouth was Christ’s own. It is an effective tool for delivering the gospel.

Placing Salvation in the Best of Hands

When I preach, some tell me how much they appreciate that I emphasize that God’s grace is “for you.” Too many other preachers present the gospel as if it were a program for either personal or social improvement. Bound wills need to hear that Christ forgives them and plants a whole new heart within them.

Renewed men and women to whom the Spirit has brought faith will work to make the world more just and peaceful.

Preaching to bound wills is less about offering the congregation a program for self-improvement and more about delivering Christ’s benefits, bringing the goods of forgiveness of sin, life, and salvation. Many preachers are rightfully concerned that Christianity can impact social health within the world. The best way to do this is to secure anxious consciences in Christ and bind up those who are deeply wounded. Renewed men and women to whom the Spirit has brought faith will work to make the world more just and peaceful.

A preacher who understands the nature of the will as the crux of theological understanding and especially how it impinges on the preaching task might join in rejoicing with Luther at the end of his treatise on the will, in one of the greatest passages in all his writings:

For my own part, I frankly confess that even if it were possible, I should not wish to have free choice given to me, or to have anything left in my own hands by which I might strive toward salvation. For, on the one hand, I should be unable to stand firm and keep hold of it amid so many adversities and perils and so many assaults of demons, seeing that even one demon is mightier than all people, and no one at all could be saved; and on the other hand, even if there were no perils or adversities or demons, I should nevertheless have to labor under perpetual uncertainty and to fight as one beating the air, since even if I lived and worked to eternity, my conscience would never be assured and certain, how much it ought to do to satisfy God. For whatever work might be accomplished, there would always remain an anxious doubt whether it pleased God or whether he required something more, as the experience of all self-justifiers proves, and as I myself learned to my bitter cost through so many years. But now, since God has taken my salvation out of my hands into his, making it depend on his choice and not mine, and has promised to save me, not by my own work or exertion but by his grace and mercy, I am assured and certain both that he is faith and will not lie to me, and also that he is too great and powerful for any demons or any adversities to be able to break him or snatch him from me. [5]

God’s mercy is nothing that a “free will” would choose. But mercy is what sinners need and what God offers them for Jesus’ sake. To deny “free will” is no downer. Instead, it affirms that everything is in the best of hands in God’s will. “Not my will, but thine be done” (Luke 22:42). So, preachers: Be bold in your calling as one of God’s delivery guys. No other message in today’s world is as important as preaching the gospel as God’s promise to forgive sins for Jesus’ sake

 

by Mark Mattes is associate professor of religion and philosophy at Grand View College in Des Moines, Iowa. He is the author of "Martin Luther’s Theology of Beauty," "The Role of Justification in Contemporary Theology," "Imaging the Journey," and "Law and Gospel in Action."

 


Wednesday, February 4, 2026

Tom Cruise received his first Academy Award recently, an honorary Oscar presented at the sixteenth
annual Academy Governors Awards. He told the assembled gathering, “Making films is not what I do, it is who I am.”

He added, “I will always do everything I can to help this art form. To support and champion new voices, to protect what makes cinema powerful. Hopefully without too many more broken bones.”

Equating what we do with who we are, our performance with our identity, is not a worldview unique to Mr. Cruise. We are made with a “God-shaped emptiness,” to paraphrase Blaise Pascal. But if secularized people will not turn to God, they will turn to anything else to fill the void. For many in a materialistic culture, our gods are therefore material measures of success such as performance, possessions, and popularity.

Accordingly, perhaps we should not be surprised that Gallup is now reporting the current “drop in US religiosity” as “among [the] largest in the world.” In 2015, 66 percent of US adults said religion was an important part of their daily life. Today, only 49 percent agree. This seventeen-point drop “ranks among the largest Gallup has recorded in any country over any ten-year period since 2007.”

“The capacity to live within a meaningful story”

In a brilliant analysis of our cultural moment, the author and cultural commentator John Seel asserts that “we are living through a civilizational inflection.” He describes this inflection:

The late sociologist Philip Rieff called our moment a Third Culture—a social order that has severed its link to the sacred. First Cultures, in his analysis, lived within mythic transcendence; Second Cultures, such as Christendom, drew moral authority from revelation. The Third Culture rejects both. It affirms freedom without form, choice without covenant, progress without purpose, overwhelmed with information without the capacity to live within a meaningful, orienting story.

It was not always this way.

I have begun reading American Sphinx: The Character of Thomas Jefferson by Joseph Ellis. In it, the acclaimed historian explains the background behind Jefferson’s immortal Declaration of Independence assertion:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.

According to Dr. Ellis,

These are not quite the words Jefferson composed in June 1776. Before editorial changes were made by the Continental Congress, Jefferson’s early draft made it even clearer that his intention was to express a spiritual vision: “We hold these truths to be sacred & undeniable; that all men are created equal & independent, that from that equal creation they derive rights inherent & unalienable, among which are the preservation of life, & liberty, & the pursuit of happiness.”

I like Mr. Jefferson’s first draft much better than the final version. Even the noted skeptic of orthodox Christianity believed that we live in a world ordered by the “sacred.”

However, many Americans would apparently not agree with him or with me today.

“Those who make them become like them”

Of course, as anyone knows who has ever built a jigsaw puzzle, the problem is that the wrong piece will not fill the right hole. Wedging the “self-evident” into the “sacred” doesn’t replace the sacred.

Idols made by humans “have mouths, but they do not speak; they have eyes, but do not see; they have ears, but do not hear, nor is there any breath in their mouths” (Psalm 135:16–17). Terrifyingly, “Those who make them become like them; so do all who trust in them” (v. 18).

In a letter to the editor, British writer G. K. Chesterton observed, “The answer to the question, ‘What is wrong?’ is, or should be, ‘I am wrong.’ Until a man can give that answer, his idealism is only a hobby.”

The solution to what is wrong with us is not doing more of what makes us wrong. Self-reliant self-fulfillment does not fulfill the self, as the current epidemic of depression, anxiety, and other mental health issues illustrates.

“Riches I heed not, nor man’s empty praise”

To this point, my analysis of secularized culture may not feel relevant to spiritual people reading a spiritual article like this. But we must beware that the same is true even of religious self-reliance: working for God is not the same thing as walking with him.

Oswald Chambers was right: “We will set up success in Christian work as the aim; the aim is to manifest the glory of God in human life, to live the life hid with Christ in God in human conditions.”

Brother Lawrence testified, “There is not in the world a kind of life more sweet and delightful than that of a continual conversation with God.” When we agree with Paul—“Whatsoever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Corinthians 10:31)—we will experience the “glory of God” in our souls. And not until then.

The hymn writer prayed:

Riches I heed not, nor man’s empty praise:
Be thou mine inheritance now and always;
Be thou and thou only the first in my heart;
O Sovereign of Heaven, my treasure thou art.

Who—or what—is your “treasure” today?

 by Jim Denison, CEO Denison Ministries 

Tuesday, February 3, 2026

Brothers, Endurance Is Formed Through Suffering

Scripture: “We rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance.” — Romans 5:3 

“For you know that the testing of your faith produces steadfastness.” — James 1:3

Thought: Endurance is never learned in theory. It is learned under load. Scripture is blunt: suffering produces endurance. 

God assigns pressure because pressure reveals weakness and then strengthens it. The soul, like muscle, grows only by resistance. In that way, you can say that pressure is a privilege.

The Puritans rejected the idea that hardship was a sign of God’s absence. John Owen insisted that affliction was one of God’s chief tools in sanctification, because it loosens our grip on false comforts. Suffering humbles us, slows us, and strips us of illusions—especially the illusion that we are sufficient.

This is why endurance cannot be microwaved. It requires time under tension. Trials that linger do something quick fixes never can: they teach patience, dependence, and trust. God is not cruel in suffering. He is precise. He shapes men by weight, not ease.

Endurance grows when a man stops asking why this hurts and starts asking what God is forming.

Reflection: Where you are tempted to escape, God may be inviting you to stay. What you call delay, God may call development. Endurance grows when suffering is received, not resisted.

Call to Action: Stop asking, “How do I get out?” Start asking, “What is God forming in me here?”

Prayer: “God of all comfort, help me not to waste my suffering. Form endurance where I want relief, and maturity where I want escape. Teach me to trust You under the weight. Amen.”

Thanks to https://betterman.com/

CONTINUED

Endurance Requires a Long View of God

 Scripture: “The steadfast love of the LORD never ceases.” — Lamentations 3:22

 “For the LORD disciplines the one he loves.” — Hebrews 12:6

 Thought: Endurance lives or dies on theology. If God is viewed as a means to comfort, endurance will collapse the moment comfort disappears. But if God is understood as sovereign, wise, and good—even when unseen—endurance becomes possible.

The Puritans spoke often of trusting the hidden hand of God. Jeremiah Burroughs taught that contentment and endurance flow from confidence in God’s ordering of events, not from understanding them. God’s purposes are often concealed, but His character is not.

Men lose endurance when they shrink God to their expectations. They endure when they expand their view of Him. A long view of God recognizes that discipline is not rejection, delay is not neglect, and silence is not absence. Endurance is sustained not by explanations, but by assurance: God knows what He is doing. Faith endures when the soul rests in who God is, not in how circumstances feel.

Reflection: Ask yourself honestly: Do I trust God’s heart when I don’t like His methods? Your theology will determine your stamina.

Call to Action: Write down one attribute of God you need to remember today [faithfulness, wisdom, sovereignty]. Anchor your endurance there.

Prayer: “Unchanging God, when my strength fails, let my trust remain. Help me endure not by answers, but by confidence in who You are. Amen.”

Thanks to https://betterman.com/