Friday, May 10, 2024

Is Jesus Your Lord or Your Advisor?

Tim Keller once said that our society determines what is right and wrong based on two questions: 

1. Do I want to do it? and 

2. Does it hurt anybody? 

And if the answer to the first question is “yes,” and the answer to the second is “no,” then it can’t possibly be wrong. It’s a simple enough rubric, but it’s terribly incomplete.

Would life be better if all of us tried to avoid hurting each other? Certainly. Is that the sum total of right and wrong? Hardly. We have this assumption in modern society—even in the church—that if we feel like we don’t see the wrong in something, it can’t possibly be wrong. 

I literally talk to people all the time—again, in the church—who say things like this. They explain away God’s laws by appealing to their own felt sense of right and wrong: Seems fine to me, so it must be okay! But here’s the deal: God’s way isn’t our way, and when he declares something wrong, it’s wrong—no matter how we rationalize it. 

It’s important for us to remember that when God declares something wrong, it’s not arbitrary—like filling out the wrong tax form or parking in a “no parking” zone. God declares wrong wrong because, ultimately, it’s harmful. Sometimes we can see that harm: God tells us not to murder because murder takes someone else’s life; God tells us not to lie because it hurts others to withhold the truth from them. The trouble is, we simply don’t have enough knowledge to be able to see the consequences all the time. If we go through life evaluating moral choices based on whether we think it does or doesn’t hurt somebody, we are assuming God-like knowledge for ourselves. And in case you haven’t noticed, you and I aren’t God. 

Think about a 7-year-old who sees nothing wrong with watching YouTube for 11 hours straight and eating Oreos for every meal. He likes watching cat videos. And Oreos taste great. Nothing seems off to him. But most of us adults would recognize that these aren’t healthy habits. We could try to explain our reasoning to our second-grader (we probably should), and he might grasp it. But he might not: It’s just tougher for him to see because he lacks life experience and wisdom. 

So let me ask you: Is there a bigger gap between your wisdom and that of your 7-year-old, or between God’s wisdom and yours? Toward the end of King David’s life, we read about a census he initiated. For readers like you and me, we probably don’t see much wrong with a census. It seems harmless, responsible even, from the outside. God isn’t always opposed to census-taking. But God had said not to take this one. Which meant that this census wasn’t responsible and harmless; it was a sin. 

 Joab, the commander of Israel’s armies, even called David out, saying, “‘May the LORD your God add to the people a hundred times as many as they are, while the eyes of my lord the king still see it, but why does my lord the king delight in this thing?’” (2 Samuel 24:3 ESV). David’s motivations for the census, it seems, were all wrong. It was about pride, security, and aggression—not obedience to God. David pushed through Joab’s objection and completed the census anyway. But afterward, David was convicted. Scripture says, “But David’s heart struck him after he had numbered the people. And David said to the LORD, ‘I have sinned greatly in what I have done. But now, O LORD, please take away the iniquity of your servant, for I have done very foolishly’” (2 Samuel 24:10). 

Was the problem here David’s pride and security in his own numbers? That was part of it, I think. David should have been finding his security in God. But the bigger issue is that David decided he knew best based on what seemed best to him. God’s law felt arbitrary, so David gave himself permission to ignore it. Who is best to determine what humanity really needs? Us or our Creator? 

To act like we know what is best for ourselves and a society based on our limited knowledge is the height of pride. If we only obey Jesus when he makes sense to us, then he’s not our Lord; he’s our advisor. Obeying God only when he makes sense to us is not obedience; it’s agreement. Have we invited God to submit his suggestions to us for consideration, or have we submitted ourselves to him because he’s God, who reigns and knows what is best? If we only obey Jesus when he makes sense to us, then he’s not our Lord; he’s our advisor. 

The post "Is Jesus Your Lord or Your Advisor?" appeared first on JD Greear Ministries

Wednesday, May 1, 2024

Men are Disconnected from the Bible and Need to Return

Evangelical publisher Robert Wolgemuth says one problem with Christianity in the U.S. is men — not what they’re doing but what they are not doing. 

“American men are tragically biblically illiterate, even guys that have gone to church all their lives,” said Mr. Wolgemuth, author and editor of more than 20 books, including “Dad’s Devotional Bible.” “And many men are very daunted by this book, overwhelmed by it.” 

Many Christian scholars and writers regard reading the Bible and understanding its message as essential for spiritual growth, but the American Bible Society’s most recent State of the Bible survey found that 59% of men say they are “disengaged” from Scripture and only 15% say they are actively engaged with the Bible. 

Why aren’t men accessing the Scriptures as they once did? Timothy Spivey, vice president for spiritual life at Pepperdine University in Malibu, California, said part of the answer lies with the rising generation of men. 

“In the 1990s, when I was a student, it was a more traditional era. Spiritual leadership on the campus was largely (but not exclusively) male back then — in concert with the traditional norms of that time,” he said. “Many 18-year-old young men today are living in a different era that doesn’t equip them as well to build relationships in the same way that people used to.”

Mr. Spivey said young adults need help developing close friendships. 

“I think it’s harder and harder for young people, male or female, to build friendships that transcend [the] social chaos around them,” he said. “So, the more we can help young men find each other relationally and build real friendships, that’s an enormously helpful thing.” 

Friendships and engagement with the Bible can help young men who either lack a male role model at home or have been bombarded with sitcoms and movies showing fathers as bumbling, inept characters. 

“Many did not grow up with a father in the home,” Mr. Spivey said. “The stereotypes offered in media are terrible. So, where can they find examples of what a godly man looks like? In church, certainly, but even more in Scripture. Scripture is also a place that provides examples of how men sin and find redemption.” 

As those men move into marriage and family life, they may face other challenges, said Jamie Tuttle, lead pastor of Dwelling Place Church in Cleveland, Tennessee. He said men are sometimes driven from the “spiritual leadership guidance role” that God intended, perhaps believing that providing for the family is all that’s required. 

“There’s a battle of good and evil, and evil is fighting for the souls of men because men are the foundation of the growth of the family,” said Mr. Tuttle, whose annual King’s Table conferences aim to instruct men in their responsibilities. 

Too many men believe that once they accept Christ as their savior, they can leave the spiritual management of the family to their wives, but that’s not what the Bible intends, he said. Women are crucial to the equation, but a father’s leadership is essential. 

“I believe that men need to be brought to the realization and even the revelation that ‘I have a major calling and purpose on my life’ outside of just saying, ‘I’ve got my heaven ticket,’” Mr. Tuttle said. 

Willie Robertson, who starred in A&E’s “Duck Dynasty” reality TV series with his family, said men often don’t know what to do with their Christianity once they accept the Lord. 

“I think some people may come to faith or think that they’ve come to faith and no one ever explained … what exactly the mission is,” 

Mr. Robertson said. “I think we have men who were, they’re kind of ‘missionless,’ they’re like, ‘Something happened. Maybe I raised my hand, and I said, ‘This sounds good to me, but no one ever explained to me exactly what exactly I’m doing and what I’m supposed to do and how I’m supposed to live and all that.” 

He said a solution is to ask men to tell their stories and share how their lives have been shaped. He then presents the Gospel as the “good news” for those who have tried everything else and outlines what a Christian life entails. Some may reject it, but others will accept it while understanding their future spiritual responsibilities. 

Next month, Mr. Robertson will publish “Gospeler: Turning Darkness Into Light One Conversation at a Time,” a book that explores the need to evangelize and disciple people in their new beliefs. 

Mr. Wolgemuth has sought to “make the Bible more accessible” to men. He was general editor for the “Men’s Daily Bible,” which includes the full text of Scripture, articles for men from noted Christian leaders and 260 devotional articles designed to be read Monday through Friday. 

He said responses to the new volume have been positive. 

“My favorite is a woman who gives this thing to her husband and says, ‘I’ve never seen him sit down with the Bible in our marriage.’ This is good,” Mr. Wolgemuth said. 

• Mark A. Kellner can be reached at mkellner@washingtontimes.com

Tuesday, April 30, 2024

If You Draw Men with a "Circus" Conference, You Have to Keep Drawing Them with "Circus" Conferences

Last week, a moment at a men's event in Springfield, Missouri, went viral. Opening the Stronger Men's Conference was professional sword-swallower and go-go dancer Alex Magala—a two-time Guinness World Record holder, Olympic Games Opening Ceremony performer, and America's Got Talent champion. 

Magala [and the conference] made headlines when Pastor Mark Driscoll, speaking at the conference, publicly rebuked his [Magala's] performance, describing it as a "strip club" act. Regarding Magala's performance, Driscoll told conference attendees that a "Jezebel spirit opened our event." He compared the performance to Old Testament pagan idol worship. At that point, event organizer John Lindell, lead pastor of the James River Church in Missouri, could be heard calling Driscoll's name and telling him that he [Driscoll] was "out of line." Lindell then says, "You're [Driscoll] done," to which Driscoll promptly leaves the stage. Disorder ensues as the crowd erupts, some applauding Driscoll's departure and many chanting, "Bring him back!" Later in the conference, Lindell and Driscoll come out on stage to reconcile. 

Since the event, the evangelical world has been up in arms, asking who was right and who was wrong. And, per usual, we are asking the wrong question. 

Whether Driscoll should have publicly rebuked the performance is irrelevant. The question we should be asking is, "What are we doing?" 

Is this what men need? 

What does a sword-swallower have to do with biblical manhood and masculinity in the first place? 

The Stronger Men's event is no stranger to spectacle—two years ago, the conference opened with Chuck Norris driving a tank through the arena. The crowd went bananas (for the record, I love Chuck Norris, the GOAT of 80's action films). 

 I want to remind Driscoll, Lindell, and the other event organizers of something Charles Spurgeon said centuries ago: "If you have to give a carnival to get people to come to church, then you will have to keep giving carnivals to keep them coming back." 

In other words, what you win men with is what you win men to. 

What Men Need 

 Men need God's Word, and men need other men. Anything that detracts from His Word and the community of other men is vain and possibly dangerous. 

At some point, we men's leaders must accept that we will not entertain men into Christ-likeness. Jake Paul is far more provoking than the Church will ever be, which is fine. As a man wanting to be more like King Jesus, I don't need Jake Paul; I need the Apostle Paul. 

And listen, I get it. Tyson v. Jake Paul will draw infinitely more men than a conference on Ephesians 5. Honestly, I'll probably tune in on July 20 to watch Tyson destroy Paul—the pinnacle of entertainment. What I don't need is Jake Paul [or Alex Magala, for that matter] headlining my spiritual development. I need God's Word and a community of older, wiser, faithful men showing me the way. 

Today, men are confused. We are more biblically illiterate and lonelier than ever. This is not by chance. For decades, the Church has been serving men wild game and sideshow acts in hopes of... honestly, I am not sure what we hoped to accomplish. What we have managed to do is become a spectacle. Those watching the Stronger Men's debacle see this circus act and think, "Is this what Biblical masculinity is all about? Christ lived, died, and rose for go-go dancing and 80's movie stars driving decommissioned army tanks?" 

Is it any wonder we can't get men to follow Jesus wholeheartedly? 

My advice. Ditch the circus acts. Give men what they need: God’s Word and community. God's Word and community. Will that sell out an arena? Probably not. But that's okay. Honestly, we have to be careful with large religious crowds—it was a large religious crowd that crucified Jesus. Give me a faithful few. After all, it was one Man who saved the world and twelve men who changed it. 

By Dr. Chris Harper, betterman.com
Chris (harp) is author, speaker, and disciple-maker, and serves as BetterMan's Chief Storyteller and CEO (April 22, 2024)

Monday, April 15, 2024

Remembering Jackie Robinson and His Faith in Christ

Major League Baseball today remembers and honors Jackie Robinson one of the greatest players to ever play the sport. Every April 15th every major league player wears the number 42 to honor what Jackie struggled through and achieved during his life. We remember him as brother in Christ! 

Brooklyn Dodgers President Branch Rickey and Jackie Robinson, the shortstop of the Kansas City Monarchs of the Negro American League, first met the morning of August 28, 1945, in Rickey’s fourth-floor office at 215 Montague Street in Brooklyn, New York. 

Clyde Sukeforth, a Brooklyn scout, told Robinson that Rickey was interested in signing the ballplayer for a Black team he was organizing, the Brooklyn Brown Dodgers. 

Rickey’s interest in a Black team, however, was a smokescreen to hide his intention of ending the national pastime’s color barrier by identifying talented players in Black baseball. His scouts recommended Robinson and other ballplayers for the Brooklyn Dodgers organization.1 

Rickey had examined every part of Robinson’s life, including his time at UCLA, where he had been a four-sport athlete; in the US Army, where he had been court-martialed for protesting after he had been sent to back of a bus; and with the Monarchs in the Negro leagues.2 

Rickey was impressed with Robinson’s athleticism but was worried about reports of the ballplayer’s temper and whether he could control it in response to what would be an unceasing amount of physical and emotional abuse from fans and players on opposing teams. If Robinson lost his temper, it would give his critics reason to confirm their belief that Blacks should not be allowed in the game. 

“I’m looking for a ballplayer with the guts not to fight back,” Rickey told Robinson. Rickey wanted to find out for himself how Robinson would respond to such indignities. He decided to test Robinson. Rickey took off his sport coat and transformed himself into a bigoted White clerk refusing Robinson a room in a Whites-only hotel; a White waiter in a restaurant denying Robinson service and calling him “boy”; and an opposing ballplayer who, as Robinson later remember, criticized “my race, my parents, in language that was almost unendurable.” And finally, Rickey was a foul-mouthed base stealer sliding hard into Robinson with his metal spikes high in the air. Rickey then swung his fist at Robinson’s head, calling him a racist epithet.3 

Rickey then opened a book published in the 1920s, Giovanni Papini’s Life of Christ, and read Jesus’ words from the Sermon on the Mountain in the Gospel of Matthew: “You have heard that it hath been said, an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil; but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.” 

Robinson knew the Gospel and knew what was required of him. 

“I have two cheeks, Mr. Rickey. Is that it?” he replied.4 

The meeting between the two Methodists, Rickey and Robinson, ultimately transformed baseball and America itself. “Robinson’s a Methodist. I’m a Methodist. God’s a Methodist,” Rickey says. “You can’t go wrong.” 

The exchange is included in 42, the movie starring Chadwick Boseman, as Robinson, and Harrison Ford as Rickey. What is often overlooked in books, articles, documentaries, and movies about Robinson’s life is that it is also a religious story. His faith in God, as he often said, carried him through the pain and anguish of integrating the major leagues. 

Michael Long and I wrote about Robinson and his faith in the 2017 book Jackie Robinson: A Spiritual Biography, which was published by Westminster John Knox Press.5 

The book begins with Robinson’s birth on January 31, 1919. As Jackie’s mother, Mallie, held her newborn son, she looked at her husband, Jerry, her brother, and her brother-in-law trying to make “sugar teats” – lard and sugar wrapped in cheesecloth to resemble nipples that would ease the baby’s assimilation into the world. Mallie slowly shook her head as she watched the hapless men spill most of the lard on the floor and then whispered a blessing to Jackie. “Bless you, my boy,” she said. “For you to survive all this, God will have to keep his eye on you.”6 Shortly after Jackie’s birth, Jerry Robinson hopped a train with another woman. Mallie found herself alone to support five children in rural Cairo, Georgia, in the hostile South, where Blacks had few opportunities, if any, to improve their standing, and any Black who confronted racial injustice ran the risk of ending up in jail, beaten, or lynched.7 

In May 1920, Rachel moved her family to Pasadena, California, where she repeatedly told Jackie and his four siblings that God would take care of them.8 

Jackie, however, did not yet have his mother’s faith or the strength to turn the other cheek. The Robinsons were the only Black family living on Pepper Street and their White neighbors made no effort to welcome them. When Jackie was 8, a girl who lived across Pepper Street from the Robinsons, called him a nigger. Jackie yelled back at her that she was “nothing but a cracker.” The girl’s father came outside the house and threw a rock at Jackie, who returned fire with a rock of his own.9 

As a teenager, Jackie refused to go with his mother to Scott Methodist Church. He belonged to a neighborhood gang, the Pepper Street Gang, which consisted not of violent boys and men as the word conjures up today but of boys who shoplifted from local grocers and got into fights with other teens.10 The boys’ petty crimes got them in trouble with the police. This increased Mallie’s concern about her son. 

She expressed his worries to the Rev. Karl Downs, the young minister at Scott Methodist. Downs found Robinson on a Pasadena street corner, told him to come see him, and persuaded him to come to church.11 Arnold Rampersad wrote in his biography of Robinson that Downs, who was just seven years older, became a good friend and a father figure to Robinson. His impact on Robinson was particularly significant 

when it came to shaping the young man’s religion. 

Rampersad said that Downs became the channel through which religious faith “finally flowed into Jack’s consciousness and was finally accepted there, if on revised terms, as he reached manhood,” Rampersad said. “Faith in God then began to register in him as both a mysterious force, beyond his comprehension, and a pragmatic way to negotiate the world.”12 

At Downs’s request, Robinson began teaching Sunday school – even on the mornings after football games he played at Pasadena Junior College and then at UCLA. “On Sunday mornings, when I woke up sore and aching because of a football game the day before, I yearned to just stay in bed. But no matter how terrible I felt, I had to get up.”13 

Robinson made a habit of praying beside his bed before going to sleep. Robinson learned that exercising faith was not just about praying. Downs instilled in Robinson the pride in being a Black man in a White-dominated world and in standing up to social injustice in a world where there was so much racial injustice. Robinson carried himself with pride. He wore White shirts that showed off his dark skin.14 

Rachel Isum, who was three years behind Robinson at UCLA, was attracted to Robinson’s handsome looks but also to his self-confidence. Robinson and Isum, who were both Methodists, began dating and remained a couple until his death in 1972. 

Robinson’s faith gave him strength during his court-martial in the Army in 1944. He was drafted in March 1942, three months after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, bringing the United States into World War II. Robinson, like most, if not every other Black soldier, faced racial discrimination in the Army. Bases were largely segregated but segregation was prohibited on military buses. 

While stationed at Fort Hood in Texas, a bus driver ordered Robinson to the back of a bus. Robinson knew he didn’t have to move and did not move. An argument followed. The base assistant provost conducted an inquiry, interviewing the bus driver, White passengers, and White MPs, but ignoring Robinson. Robinson, who felt he was not given the respect demanded of an officer, interrupted the questioning. He was accused of not showing proper respect to a commandeering officer. If found guilty, he could be sentenced to a military prison. As Robinson sat in shackles in the courtroom, he relied on his faith in God, remembering his mother’s words. “You are a child of God, made in God’s image. Because God is there, nothing can go wrong with you,” she had told him. “You can allow yourself to take risks because you just know that the Lord will not allow you to sink so far that you can’t swim.”15 

Robinson was acquitted of all charges. By the time of the acquittal, Robinson’s battalion had left for Europe, where it fought in the bloody Battle of the Bulge. By confronting racial discrimination at Fort Hood, he was prevented from going abroad where he might have been injured or killed. Robinson was discharged and began playing in the segregated Negro leagues, where he was playing when Branch Rickey was searching for the right player to break baseball’s color barrier. By confronting racial discrimination in the Army, he would be available to confront racial discrimination in baseball. 

Robinson did not like playing in Negro leagues. He did not like the catch-as-catch-all playing schedule or the constant traveling where they might play games in two different cities on the same day and couldn’t stay in Whites-only hotels or eat in Whites-only restaurants. He did not drink alcohol or chase women as many of his teammates did. Robinson openly scorned his whiskey-drinking and promiscuous teammates, once tossing a glass of scotch into a burning fireplace to demonstrate the lethality of liquor. He stunned his teammates by telling them he was waiting until marriage to have sex. 

“His sense of self was tightly wound around core values of dignity and self-esteem, and he believed in God and the Bible,” Rampersad wrote about Robinson. “Absurdly or not, he drew a line in the dirt between himself and sin, and tried not to cross it.”16 As influential as Karl Downs was in Robinson’s life, no one had a more profound impact on Robinson than Rickey. Rickey too owed his strong sense of faith to his mother, Emily, who taught him stories from the Bible. 

Rickey biographer Lee Lowenfish said Emily Rickey’s stories from Scripture reinforced in her son “the belief that there was a right way and a wrong way to life.”17 This meant that God came first to Rickey, whose religious devotion was such that he didn’t attend baseball games on Sundays. 

Rickey and Robinson forever changed baseball and society on October 23, 1945, when the Montreal Royals, the Triple-A team in the Brooklyn organization, announced it had signed Robinson. Robinson knew that much of White America would judge all Blacks by how well he played and how well he comported himself. If he failed in either way, his failure reflected badly on all Blacks. Robinson’s first test came when Jackie and Rachel, having just married, left Southern California for the Deep South, where Jackie would try to win a spot on the Montreal roster during spring training in Florida. The Robinson were bumped from two planes and replaced by White passengers. Shortly after they boarded a bus near Pensacola, a bus driver, calling Jackie “boy,” ordered the newlyweds to the back of the bus. Jackie turned his cheek both times.18 

Robinson was chased out of Sanford, Florida, by the Ku Klux Klan. A number of cities refused to allow the integrated Montreal team to play. Robinson struggled with his hitting and he injured his throwing arm. Robinson played his first game of the spring in Daytona Beach on Sunday, March 17.19 Black ministers gave sermons about Robinson that morning and asked their parishioners to pray for him. When services ended, Blacks, in their Sunday clothes, walked to the ballpark.20 What happened in Daytona Beach repeated itself elsewhere in cities where Robinson played. “I know how wonderful it felt on a number of occasions, when a Negro minister approached me at the ball club and said, ‘You know, I cut my sermon short today so the people could get out of church early and get to the ball park to root for you,’” Robinson said. “My minister friends tell me that when the average minister cuts down his sermon, he is making one of the greatest sacrifices known to man.” Robinson credited Black ministers for his success. “I owe so much to the Negro ministers, and it is a debt I never intend to forget.”21 

Robinson played the 1946 season with the Montreal Royals and was then promoted to the Dodgers the following spring. He knew that if he succeeded in the major leagues, he would change the way a lot of Whites thought about Blacks. If he succeeded, it would mean that other Blacks would get opportunities that were now closed to them. If he could overcome racial discrimination, then others could, too.22 

No athlete ever faced either the pressure or abuse that Robinson did when he took the field for the first time in a Brooklyn uniform on April 15, 1947. Robinson clearly understood the stakes at play. Robinson knew Rickey could only do so much and that his own success depended on his own ability, but also providence. “His religion had taught him that the line between confidence and Satanic pride is a fine one; – a twisted ankle, a turned knee – might yet intervene to reassert the inscrutable ways of Providence,” Rampersad wrote. “The drama would unfold; he would be both spectator and the man at the plate; God would decide the outcome.”23 

Robinson believed that God was on his side.24 

Robinson did not merely endure in the face of constant death threats, opposing pitchers throwing at him, base runners spiking him, or fans screaming the ugliest of racial epithets; he thrived. His faith formed in him an indomitable spirit. Robinson promised Rickey he would respond to his detractors by turning the other cheek, and he did. “In observing that trust,” Rickey said, “he has had an almost Christ-like taste of turning the other cheek.”25 

Robinson continued with his nightly ritual of praying, once telling a reporter about his faith in God and his nightly ritual of kneeling at his bedside. “It’s the best way to get closer to God,” Robinson said, and then the second baseman added with a smile, “and a hard-hit ground ball.” 

After Robinson retired from baseball, he wrote newspaper columns for the New York Post and the Amsterdam News in New York. Many of the columns are collected in the book Beyond Home Plate, which is edited by Michael Long. In one column, Robinson compared his own experience with “turning the other cheek” with the nonviolent confrontation of the civil-rights movement espoused by his friend, Martin Luther King Jr. “I can testify to the fact that it was a lot harder to turn the other cheek and refuse to fight back than it would have been to exercise a normal reaction,” 

Robinson wrote. “But it works, because sooner or later it brings a sense of shame to those who attack you. And that sense of shame is often the beginning of progress.”26 

CHRIS LAMB is chair of the journalism and public-relations department at Indiana University- Indianapolis. He is the author of 11 books, including Blackout: The Untold Story of Jackie Robinson’s First Spring Training; Conspiracy of Silence: Sportswriters and the Long Campaign to Desegregate Baseball; Jackie Robinson: A Spiritual Biography; and, most recently, Sports Journalism: A History of Glory, Fame, and Technology.  

Notes 

1 Lee Lowenfish, Branch Rickey: Baseball’s Ferocious Gentleman (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2007), 373-374. Arnold Rampersad, Jackie Robinson: A Biography (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1997), 125-126. 

2 Lowenfish, 368-369. 

3 Rampersad, 127. 

4 Lowenfish, 375-376; Rampersad, 127. 

5 Michael Long and Chris Lamb, Jackie Robinson: A Spiritual Biography (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2017). 

6 Long and Lamb, 13. 

7 Long and Lamb, 18. 

8 Long and Lamb, 18. 

9 Rampersad, 24. 

10 Long and Lamb, 23-24. 

11 Long and Lamb, 25. 

12 Rampersad, 53. 

13 Jackie Robinson and Alfred Duckett, I Never Had It Made (Hopewell, New Jersey: Ecco Press, 1972), 8. 

14 Long and Lamb, 34-36. 

 15 Rampersad, 102-111. 

16 Rampersad, 118. 

17 Lowenfish, 

18 Chris Lamb, Blackout: The Untold Story of Jackie Robinson’s First Spring Training (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2012), 5-14. 

19 Lamb, Blackout, 87-89, 94-95, 103, 135, 140.

 20 Lamb, Blackout, 104, 105. 

21 Long and Lamb, 75. 

22 Long and Lamb, 84. 

23 Rampersad, 168. 

24 Long and Lamb, 85. 

25 Wendell Smith, “Sports Beat,” Pittsburgh Courier, February 28, 1948. Quoted in Long and Lamb, 98. 

26 Chris Lamb, “Jackie Robinson: Faith in Himself and in God,” Wall Street Journal, April 11, 2013. 

 

Wednesday, March 27, 2024

Only What’s Done for Christ Will Last

As I was ruminating this morning about my 77 years of life (44 as a Christian; 25 as a pastor and parachurch leader in the DC area) - I remembered what British missionary C.T. Studd (1860-1929) once penned: 

"Oh let my love with fervor burn, And from the world now let me turn;
Living for Thee, and Thee alone,
Bringing Thee pleasure on Thy throne;
Only one life, ’twill soon be past,
Only what’s done for Christ will last.
Only one life, yes only one,
Now let me say, “Thy will be done”;
And when at last I’ll hear the call,
I know I’ll say “twas worth it all”;
Only one life, ’twill soon be past, 
Only what’s done for Christ will last. 

Some of us have much joy in this life, others much sorrow. Some of us are given public platforms and recognition, and others of us live in obscurity and hardship. But one thing we’re all promised in this life is that it will soon end. Everyone will stand before the judgment seat of Christ (2 Corinthians 5:10). Nothing will be hidden. All our motivations and desires will be revealed. Then, before our Holy and Righteous God, we will all give an account of how and why we used the days, words, relationships, resources, skills, and opportunities God entrusted to us. 

For that day, O Lord make us ever mindful that only what is done for Christ will last. Lord, help us! May the legacies we leave as husbands, fathers, disciplers, as churchmen, pastors, leaders of ministries, and brothers in Christ be God-besotted, Christ-exalting and blood-bought Bible guys — who believed that God is most glorified in us when we were most satisfied in Him. May our lasting legacy be not so much in what we accomplished but in who we were in Christ Jesus. “So teach us to number our days that we may get a heart of wisdom.” Psalm 90:12

 Dave Brown, Director of WACMM

Tuesday, March 26, 2024

The Story of Jesus Guarantees How Your Story Will End

How will my story end? This is the question in the mind of every human being.

How will my marriage end?

What will happen to my career?

Will my suffering ever end?

How will my kids turn out?

Will my investments pay off?

How will I get myself out of this mess?

Will I pass this course?

What will I have to deal with in old age?

What will I do after I graduate?

How will my ministry turn out?

Will the Bible turn out to be true? 

These kinds of questions somehow, some way, haunt every human being. It doesn’t take many years of life before you conclude that you’re not only not in control of the big things in life, but also that there are very few things you actually control. It doesn’t take long for the delusion of self-sovereignty to shatter. We’re all also confronted with the fact that we live in a broken world that doesn’t function the way the Creator intended. As a child, you aren’t capable of theologically thinking this through, but you know messed-up and hurtful things happen a lot. As an adult, you adjust your expectations because you know the kinds of things that can happen in a fallen world. 

In our smallness, we wonder if our lives will turn out the way we hoped and dreamed. My answer may surprise you. No, you won’t get much of what you hoped for and probably few of your dreams. But here’s the wonderful encouraging flip side of my answer. What you will get as God’s child is way better than anything you could’ve hoped for and incomparably better than your brightest dream. Pay careful attention to what I am able to say. God doesn’t guarantee you’ll get your temporary dream; what he guarantees you is forever.

Because we are rational beings, we don’t live life based only on the facts of our experience; we depend on our interpretation of our experience. We never leave our own lives alone. We are always thinking, interpreting, and rethinking. We carry assumptions with us and we draw conclusions, which color future observations. Let me say this another way: we are all storytellers, and our audience is us. We all compose a story of how we think our life should unfold; it’s a story of what we desire and dream. And we all work to make the plot that we have written for ourselves come true. But grace introduces another author.

We are not actually the authors of our own stories; God is. He wrote our story ages before we took our first breath. Every situation, location, and relationship was written into the chapters of his book, by his sovereign hand. And by grace, he has embedded our story into the great and grand, origin-to-destiny redemptive story. We are now citizens of his kingdom; we now live in the shadow of his glory, and we are now called to live with his purpose in mind. Because our story has been embedded in his story, there is no doubt how our story will end.

Yes, we will suffer along the way. Yes, our hearts will go through seasons where they are laden with grief. No, we won’t always be healthy. Yes, we will be weak and we will fail. Yes, loved ones will leave us. Sometimes we will go through seasons of want. We won’t always be respected and appreciated. We won’t always experience true justice. There will be chapters in the story that God has written for us that will be very hard. But we must remember two things. First, he has written himself into the story so that he will always be with us, giving us what we could never give to ourselves. Second, what your Lord has written for you is not less than the plot you have written for yourself, but infinitely more.

Most of us would be satisfied with temporal human happiness. We’d be satisfied with a good job, a nice house, a reliable car, a good church, a good marriage, successful children, and health and pleasure in our later years. But all of these dreams are not only self-oriented, but they are so dramatically brief when compared to the expansiveness of God’s story. So rather than deliver our small and self-oriented dreams, God did something better: he sent his Son to earth.

Jesus was willing to come, suffer, and die so that we would have a way better story. He suffered so that our suffering would end forever. He lived a selfless life so that we would be freed from our bondage to ourselves, so that for all eternity we would know the liberating joy of living for something and someone bigger than ourselves. Because of his humiliation we will know the exaltation of living forever in the presence of the King.

Know today that no matter what you are going through, because of the grace of the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, your little story has now been absorbed into his great story of victory over all that sin has broken. Because of what Jesus has done, you can rest in knowing the glorious way your story will end. In fact, because of the grace of Jesus, the end of your story is that it has no end! 

From Journey to the Cross: A 40-Day Lenten Devotional by Paul Tripp

Saturday, March 23, 2024

What We Get Wrong about Nicodemus and Joseph

Often chided by readers of Scripture for hiding their faith, Nicodemus and Joseph, two Pharisees, showed more courage than you realize.

We know from the Gospels that Jesus’ ministry provoked mostly widespread opposition from religious leaders, both the Sadducees and the Pharisees. But the Bible also shows specific examples of religious leaders who earnestly sought to understand Jesus and eventually became followers of Christ. Of these, Nicodemus is perhaps the most prominent. Nicodemus was a Pharisee but held a seat on the Sanhedrin, the prestigious, 70-member ruling body dominated by Sadducees. We first meet him in the pages of John’s gospel as he seeks out a secret meeting with Jesus at night and probes the itinerant teacher with a series of questions.

It’s easy to question why Nicodemus came to Jesus at night, away from the crowds. Those of us who have never faced any opposition for our Christian faith, who probably have more fish stickers on our cars than we do unbelieving friends, might not get what it is like to live as a Christian in a desperately hostile environment, but we would be foolish to consider Nicodemus a coward in this moment.

Even to meet with Jesus at night was an act of courage, a willingness to obey that small voice of faith. To be seen with Jesus carried enormous risk for such a prestigious religious leader. The Pharisees would soon cast off anyone from their synagogue if they professed faith in Jesus (John 9:22), something Jesus would later warn his disciples of in his Upper Room Discourse (16:2).

Jesus never rebuked Nicodemus for his slow, secret quest. R. C. Sproul says this is in keeping “with our Lord’s refusal to put out a faith that, being mingled with fear, seems to be a smoldering wick (Isa. 42:3).”

We should be thankful for this smoldering wick, for Nicodemus’s probing questions of Jesus inspired perhaps the most beautiful words in all of Scripture: Jesus’ declaration of his mission, words the Spirit of God has blown into the hearts of so many in the millennia since this fateful encounter. “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life” (John 3:16). By these words, many smoldering wicks, many Nicodemuses, have met Jesus in their own dark nights of the soul and have emerged as children of the light.

We don’t know if Nicodemus converted that night, but he shows up again in John’s gospel (John 7:50–51), defending Jesus in what seems to be a private discussion among religious leaders. The Pharisees were angry that Jesus had declared himself to be “living water” at the Feast of Tabernacles, a sacred rite that commemorated God’s faithfulness in the desert (Lev. 23:42–43). Jesus invited the Jewish pilgrims in Jerusalem that day to believe in him and find “streams of living water” (John 7:38, CSB), a fulfillment of the prediction by the prophets of the coming of the Holy Spirit (Isa. 55:1; Joel 2:28). His claims of deity caused some to believe but also enraged many Pharisees at what they considered blasphemy. Nicodemus urged them to resist a rush to judgment on Jesus’ deity, reminding them that the law required doing due diligence.

Again, we don’t really know the state of Nicodemus’s faith at this point. Was he still a seeker just pleading for a full hearing for Jesus? Was he speaking of his own journey, of his own personal investigation of the claims of Christ? We cannot say. But he shows courage in standing up to the crowd. Months later, Jesus would not get a fair hearing from the very ruling body, the Sanhedrin, that Nicodemus served with such distinction.

Integrity and wealth

In the Christmas story, we meet an unknown man named Joseph who helped care for Jesus in his birth. In the Easter story, we meet another unknown man named Joseph who helps care for Jesus in his death.

Joseph of Arimathea shows up in every gospel account of Jesus’ death. He is described by Matthew as a “rich man” and a “disciple of Jesus” (Matt. 27:57–60). Mark describes him as a “prominent member” of the Sanhedrin and someone who was “waiting for the kingdom of God” (Mark 15:42–46). Luke calls Joseph “a good and upright man,” a “member of the Council” who didn’t agree with their decision to seek Jesus’ death (Luke 23:50–51). John calls him a “disciple of Jesus” who kept his faith secret due to fear of his fellow religious leaders (John 19:38).

Joseph’s hometown was the Judean village of Arimathea, a town in the hilly region of Ephraim, 20 miles northwest of Jerusalem. Some scholars think this was also the hometown of Samuel, Israel’s celebrated prophet and priest.

The gospel writers are clear that Joseph, like Job, was known for both his integrity and his wealth. This is a good reminder that riches and righteousness are not always mutually exclusive. God often calls the poor and ignoble of this world, but that doesn’t preclude him from calling wealthy Christians to use their means for the kingdom of God. Joseph was one of those men.

Like every faithful Pharisee, he was looking for the kingdom of God, but Mark’s gospel tells us that while many of his peers found that “kingdom” in obedience to the law and personal piety, Joseph saw the fulfillment of those kingdom promises in Jesus. But as a Sanhedrin member, he had to keep his allegiance a secret.

Unlikely allies

The lives of Nicodemus and Joseph converged as they became unlikely actors in God’s redemptive drama. These two had a lot in common as Pharisees on a Sadducee-dominated Sanhedrin. Pharisees were minorities among Israel’s elite leadership, even as they were the majority sect among the people.

We can imagine how Nicodemus, Joseph, and other Pharisees on the council must have winced at the elitism of their peers and fought for the voice of the people among the corruption and self-dealings of the leadership class. Pharisees resisted the worldliness of the Greco-Roman culture and loathed their Roman
occupiers. They wanted Israel to live up to its calling by God to be a distinct people. They eagerly awaited the kingdom of God and the resurrection at the end of the age. The Sadducees were much more sophisticated, preferring accommodation with the Romans, even purchasing power through corruption and backroom deals. They held the seats of power, including the chief priest roles. And they rejected belief in miracles and the afterlife.

But it was Jesus, even more than the Sanhedrin, who would bring Nicodemus and Joseph close. To believe in this itinerant rabbi and his claims to be the Son of God put them at odds even with their Pharisee brethren. We can’t imagine the wrestling in their souls as they straddled their identity as proud Pharisees and the tug of the Spirit on their hearts as they investigated the claims of Jesus. These two men, strong in integrity and righteousness, could not escape the conclusion that would put them at odds with their synagogue, their families, and their community.

But how providential of God to have Nicodemus and Joseph find each other. We can imagine the hallway conversations and the late-night sessions discussing Jesus. And we can then imagine the terrible discomfort each would feel as Jesus was arrested and stood trial before their august body. Did they push back among other members of the Sanhedrin? Did they reiterate Nicodemus’s plea that his fellow religious leaders resist the rush to judgment and give Jesus a fair hearing? Luke tells us Joseph disagreed with the decision, but how strongly did they voice that dissent, and were they silenced?

How powerless these two powerful men must have felt! Yet what they couldn’t know and didn’t yet understand was that Jesus’ march to the cross was not really the work of the Sanhedrin.

Going public

Somewhere between the trial before the Sanhedrin and Jesus’ crucifixion, Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus made a decision to take their private faith public with an extraordinary gesture. Perhaps exhausted by the long days, disillusioned by their fellow Pharisees’ embrace of injustice, or grieving the loss of the one upon whom they’d rested their messianic hopes, they decided to give Jesus in his death what Israel had refused him in his life: acknowledgment as King. He would be buried not in an empty field but in a rich man’s tomb, fulfilling the words of the prophet Isaiah (Isa. 53:9).

So Joseph requested permission from Pilate, the Roman governor, to take Jesus’ body off the cross. The request caught Pilate by surprise. Typically, a criminal would be dumped into an empty grave or pauper’s field, buried ignominiously under a pile of rocks. So this was highly unusual. Perhaps Pilate was relieved that this Jesus problem was finally taken care of. But more than that, he was probably surprised to see a member of the Sanhedrin standing before him, willing to risk position and reputation to give an enemy of the state, one convicted of treason and insurrection, a king’s burial.

There were many important considerations for Joseph and Nicodemus and for the women who accompanied them to the burial of Jesus. It was important not only to get the body off the cross but also to bury it quickly before sundown and the start of Sabbath on Passover week, when work had to cease. Joseph’s tomb made sense as a burial spot, likely near Golgotha, where Jesus was crucified, but outside the city walls.

Both Joseph and Nicodemus made great sacrifices—Joseph in giving up his tomb and Nicodemus in paying for costly burial spices and ointments. John 19:39 says it was 75 pounds, an extraordinary amount, reminiscent of Mary’s extravagant display of washing Jesus’ feet with expensive perfume (12:3).

Peeling Jesus’ bloody body off the cross and carrying him the distance to the tomb was a difficult task. He had to be carefully wrapped in bandages and anointed with both myrrh as a preservative and aloes and perfumes to minimize the stench of decomposition. This was an act of love for Joseph and Nicodemus: two high-ranking religious officials stooping low and exhausting themselves to honor their Lord. You imagine their friends, their families, wondering why these two men of stature would take such care for a rejected Messiah, a despised enemy of Rome.

We can’t know exactly what they were thinking as they performed this thankless task—whether, for instance, fear and doubt were creeping into their hearts. But we know that their private faith, the secret they whispered to each other in the halls of Jerusalem, would now be public.

Quiet shouts

It’s easy to wonder why Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea were so quiet about their faith. But I think this perspective is unfair and shortsighted. Courage looks different on different people and in different situations.

At times Jesus did not speak or move about openly, knowing his enemies were seeking him but that his time had not yet come. There are situations where prudence is the best witness: Think of Christians in closed countries, working to slowly plant seeds of gospel witness. Or Christians in prominent leadership roles who must weigh their words in order to steward their influence. This isn’t always cowardice. Sometimes we need a Dietrich Bonhoeffer faith, willing to suffer death for our convictions. But other times we need a Brother Andrew faith, stealthily working underground to advance God’s mission.

This is hard to comprehend in an age when we think every thought has to be expressed all the time on every medium. Public proclamation is important, but so is the need to “make it your ambition to lead a quiet life” (1 Thess. 4:11) and to be “quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry” (James 1:19).

Nicodemus and Joseph showed courage when it mattered, and not a moment too soon. Their inclusion in the Easter story shows us how God works in mysterious ways to accomplish his purposes in the world; it shows the gospel’s power to work in the most surprising places. The Sanhedrin seemed the last place to find disciples of Jesus. Even as the kingdom of God was moving among the poor and the outcast, it was also moving among the powerful, in the very councils that wrote his death sentence, flashing pinpricks of light into a dark world.

Some of the most important evidence for Jesus’ resurrection would be gathered by members of the very body that sent him to the cross. Nicodemus and Joseph both saw him physically dead, a lifeless corpse leaking blood and water. And they buried him in a prominent place where nobody could mistake the miracle, so much so that Jesus’ enemies had to bribe the Roman soldiers assigned to guard Jesus to lie about it (Matt. 28:11–15).

God used Nicodemus and Joseph in creating the most important apologetic of the Christian faith. Without the empty tomb, we are, to quote Paul, “of all men most miserable” (1 Cor. 15:19, KJV). The secret disciples, by their quiet acts of faithfulness, shouted the good news of God’s redemptive love to the world.

This is an excerpt from The Characters of Easter by Daniel Darling available today from Moody Publishers. Mar 23, 2024

 One Little Word is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Blo

Monday, March 4, 2024

Joe Rogan Said What?

I don’t follow Joe Rogan, a popular podcaster, but this past week, Rogan said the following on his podcast:

“The problem with living in a secular society … that has a lot of people who are atheists, who have no belief system … is that you find a belief system and that a lot of these people that call themselves atheists [have] subscribed to the religion of ‘woke.’ You know, their god is equity and inclusiveness. Their god is this ideology that they think you have to subscribe to.

“And that’s why it’s spooky. Human beings seem to have a very strong desire for some sort of order and form and some sort of pattern that they can follow, which seems to be the right way to go. And they can be led. They can be led by cults. They can be led by groups of people. They can be led by, you know, intolerant governments and evil armies and corrupt politicians. They can be led.

“But I think as time rolls on, people are going to understand the need to have some sort of divine structure to things, some sort of belief in the sanctity of love and of truth. And a lot of that comes from religion. A lot of people’s moral compass and the guidelines that they’ve followed to live a just and righteous life have come from religion. We need Jesus. For real.”

While I don't know what, if any relationship he has with Jesus, but what Mr. Rogan said is precisely what Christians have been saying for 2,000 years.

First, as Pascal inferred, a vacuum is always filled. Everyone who claims to have no belief system will, by default, create a new one. History is replete with the lesson of Robespierre: All who deny God will inevitably declare themselves to be God. Or, as St. Paul told the first-century Romans, everyone either “worships the Creator or worships the created.”

Human beings, by definition, as Mr. Rogan says, “have a strong desire for some sort of order and form.” If none exists, we create it. Chaos cannot sustain itself. It is always corrected by the rule of government over every aspect of our lives or the rule of God in our hearts.

Second, people will be led. From time immemorial, we see that men and women will inevitably follow the leader. Whether it be the coercion of “governments and evil armies,” as suggested by Mr. Rogan, or the creeds of the church, we will all “choose this day whom we will serve.” This is human nature. Bob Dylan told us we are all “going to serve somebody.” “It may be the devil or it may be the Lord,” but we will be led.

Third, human beings are the imago Dei; we are not the imago dog. We are made in the image of God, and as such, we alone, as Mr. Rogan suggests, understand the “sanctity of truth.”

This is an exclusive human capacity. Dogs don’t argue or debate. Animals have no understanding of the difference between honesty and deceit. God’s thumbprint of moral awareness is uniquely stamped on the human soul.

This alone explains what Mr. Rogan calls our desire to “live a just and righteous life.” This is what separates us from the rest of creation. We are made in God’s image. Nothing else around us is.

Fourth, we need Jesus. Our dilemma is that despite standing alone as bearing God’s likeness in our hearts, minds and souls, we are broken. Our rebellion against our Creator has brought a universal curse on all people, in all times and in all places. Evidence of this is rife in the daily news.

G.K. Chesterton said nearly 100 years ago that “original sin is the only doctrine that’s been empirically validated by 2,000 years of human history.” All we need to see the proof that everyone is a hopeless sinner is to read today’s news.

Joe Rogan is absolutely right: We all need something to believe in. All of us can and will be led. We all yearn for truth. And every one of us “needs Jesus.”

But which Jesus is it that we need? Is it the one that looks like the God we see in the Bible, or is it the one that looks like the God we see in the mirror, you know, the “affirming” one rather than the great “I am” who said we “must be born again” and to “go and sin no more”?

C.S. Lewis once instructed: “Either [Jesus] was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something worse.”

The Jesus we all need is neither a liar nor a lunatic, but precisely who he said he was and proved by his resurrection: He is our Lord, our savior and our king. He is the Alpha and Omega and the beginning and the end. He is the Word made flesh and dwelling among us. He was there at the “beginning of days,” and he will judge us at the end of them. Jesus is the way, the truth and the life, and no one comes to the Father but through him. This is the “for real” Jesus that we all need. Without him, our culture is doomed, and we are all lost.

• Everett Piper (dreverettpiper.com, @dreverettpiper), a columnist for The Washington Times, is a former university president and radio host.

Tuesday, January 2, 2024

Why is the Gospel the Most Important Thing for You in 2024?

In the midst of a world filled with darkness, despair and desperation, the word gospel literally means
"good news." In fact it is not only good news but the best news possible - God graciously, saves hell-bound sinners like you and me in the person and work of His Son, Jesus Christ.

There's a real sense in which we could say the gospel is Jesus Christ, and that's what Romans 1, 3, 4, and 5 teaches, that the gospel concerns the Son of God, Jesus Christ.

So the gospel concerns the entrance of Christ into this world on a mission of salvation. He's come to seek and to save that which is lost. He's come to lay down His life for ransom for many.

So to understand the gospel, it is that Jesus was born of a virgin, that He was born under the law. He obeyed the law at every point such that in our disobedience to the law, Christ has now obeyed for us in our place, and He has met all the demands of the law.

When He went to the cross, He suffered the curse of the law because of our lawbreaking. And on the cross, Him who knew no sin, God made to be sin for us. All the sins of all those who would ever believe upon Christ were transferred to Him as He hung upon the cross.

And Jesus propitiated the righteous anger of God. Jesus reconciled sinful man to Holy God. Jesus redeemed us or bought us out of the slave market of sin. All of this was accomplished by His substitutionary death in our place upon the cross and when He said, "It is finished," tetelestai; that means "paid in full." He had paid in full our sin debt.

He was taken down from the cross, buried in a borrowed tomb; on the third day He was raised from the dead, which validated that the death He died was a sufficient payment for our sins accepted by the Father.

He ascended to the right hand of God, where He is now seated next to the Majesty on high. And the Bible says whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

Everyone needs to be saved, and we might ask, Saved from what? The answer is, saved from God. Saved from the wrath of a holy, righteous God, and there's only One who can save from the wrath of God, and that is God Himself. His mercy and His grace saves us from His wrath.

The gospel is the free offer of salvation through the work of Christ to those who have no merit of their own by which to receive this gospel. It is offered as a free gift, and it can only be received with the empty hand of faith.

Faith alone in Christ alone, offered by the grace of God alone. That in a nutshell is the gospel of Jesus Christ.

By Dr. Steve Lawson

What Makes the Gospel Good News?

The word gospel literally means "good news." It is the good news of salvation that God has provided
in the person and work of His Son, Jesus Christ.

There's a real sense in which we could say the gospel is Jesus Christ, and that's what Romans 1, 3, 4, and 5 teaches, that the gospel concerns the Son of God, Jesus Christ.

So the gospel concerns the entrance of Christ into this world on a mission of salvation. He's come to seek and to save that which is lost. He's come to lay down His life for ransom for many.

So to understand the gospel, it is that Jesus was born of a virgin, that He was born under the law. He obeyed the law at every point such that in our disobedience to the law, Christ has now obeyed for us in our place, and He has met all the demands of the law.

When He went to the cross, He suffered the curse of the law because of our lawbreaking. And on the cross, Him who knew no sin, God made to be sin for us. All the sins of all those who would ever believe upon Christ were transferred to Him as He hung upon the cross.

And Jesus propitiated the righteous anger of God. Jesus reconciled sinful man to Holy God. Jesus redeemed us or bought us out of the slave market of sin. All of this was accomplished by His substitutionary death in our place upon the cross and when He said, "It is finished," tetelestai; that means "paid in full." He had paid in full our sin debt.

He was taken down from the cross, buried in a borrowed tomb; on the third day He was raised from the dead, which validated that the death He died was a sufficient payment for our sins accepted by the Father.

He ascended to the right hand of God, where He is now seated next to the Majesty on high. And the Bible says whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

Everyone needs to be saved, and we might ask, Saved from what? The answer is, saved from God. Saved from the wrath of God, and there's only One who can save from the wrath of God, and that is God Himself. His mercy and His grace saves us from His wrath.

The gospel is the free offer of salvation through the work of Christ to those who have no merit of their own by which to receive this gospel. It is offered as a free gift, and it can only be received with the empty hand of faith.

Faith alone in Christ alone, offered by the grace of God alone. That in a nutshell is the gospel of Jesus Christ.

by Dr. Steve Lawson, Ligonier Ministries